Problem packetWorkR1193
[#R1193] Resolve the stated acceptance condition
1Summary
Give a rigorous proof or counterexample that completely resolves this statement: Erdős Problem 124: Let $k$ be a nonzero integer, and let $D$ be a finite set of integers, each at least $3$, such that \[\sum_{d \in D} \frac{1}{d-1} \geq 1\] and $\gcd(D) = 1$. For each $d \in D$ and each integer $k \geq 0$, let $S(d,k)$ denote the set of natural numbers that can be written as \[\sum_{i \in s} d^i\] for some finite set $s$ of integers with $i \geq k$ for all $i \in s$. Does every sufficiently large natural number belong to the set \[\sum_{d \in D} S(d,k),\] that is, can it be expressed as $\sum_{d \in D} x_d$ where $x_d \in S(d,k)$ for each $d \in D$?
Target the displayed statement directly. Give a rigorous proof or counterexample that completely resolves this statement: Erdős Problem 124: Let $k$ be a nonzero integer, and let $D$ be a finite set of integers, each at least $3$, such that \[\sum_{d \in D} \frac{1}{d-1} \geq 1\] and $\gcd(D) = 1$. For each $d \in D$ and each integer $k \geq 0$, let $S(d,k)$ denote the set of natural numbers that can be written as \[\sum_{i \in s} d^i\] for some finite set $s$ of integers with $i \geq k$ for all $i \in s$. Does every sufficiently large natural number belong to the set \[\sum_{d \in D} S(d,k),\] that is, can it be expressed as $\sum_{d \in D} x_d$ where $x_d \in S(d,k)$ for each $d \in D$? Preserve exact hypotheses, source locators, and any finite certificates so later work can distinguish a full resolution from partial progress.
Reported evidence. Replay readiness: source only.
2Outcome
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: www.erdosproblems.com ↗, Editorial research route recorded 2026-07-31
3How it connects
Addresses
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
4Agent packet
A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.
View structured packet
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1193",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "erdos-problem-124-attempt-resolution-route",
"type": "attempt",
"title": "Resolve the stated acceptance condition",
"summary": "Give a rigorous proof or counterexample that completely resolves this statement: Erdős Problem 124: Let $k$ be a nonzero integer, and let $D$ be a finite set of integers, each at least $3$, such that\n\\[\\sum_{d \\in D} \\frac{1}{d-1} \\geq 1\\]\nand $\\gcd(D) = 1$. For each $d \\in D$ and each integer $k \\geq 0$, let $S(d,k)$ denote the set of natural numbers that can be written as\n\\[\\sum_{i \\in s} d^i\\]\nfor some finite set $s$ of integers with $i \\geq k$ for all $i \\in s$. Does every sufficiently large natural number belong to the set\n\\[\\sum_{d \\in D} S(d,k),\\]\nthat is, can it be expressed as $\\sum_{d \\in D} x_d$ where $x_d \\in S(d,k)$ for each $d \\in D$?",
"relevance": "For Erdős Problem 124: Sums of Distinct Powers with Nonzero Exponent Shift, record erdos-problem-124-attempt-resolution-route (“Resolve the stated acceptance condition”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Give a rigorous proof or counterexample that completely resolves this statement: Erdős Problem 124: Let $k$ be a nonzero integer, and let $D$ be a finite set of integers, each at least $3$, such that\n\\[\\sum_{d \\in D} \\frac{1}{d-1} \\geq 1\\]\nand $\\gcd(D) = 1$.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Target the displayed statement directly. Give a rigorous proof or counterexample that completely resolves this statement: Erdős Problem 124: Let $k$ be a nonzero integer, and let $D$ be a finite set of integers, each at least $3$, such that\n\\[\\sum_{d \\in D} \\frac{1}{d-1} \\geq 1\\]\nand $\\gcd(D) = 1$. For each $d \\in D$ and each integer $k \\geq 0$, let $S(d,k)$ denote the set of natural numbers that can be written as\n\\[\\sum_{i \\in s} d^i\\]\nfor some finite set $s$ of integers with $i \\geq k$ for all $i \\in s$. Does every sufficiently large natural number belong to the set\n\\[\\sum_{d \\in D} S(d,k),\\]\nthat is, can it be expressed as $\\sum_{d \\in D} x_d$ where $x_d \\in S(d,k)$ for each $d \\in D$? Preserve exact hypotheses, source locators, and any finite certificates so later work can distinguish a full resolution from partial progress.",
"status": "open_strategy",
"evidence_grade": "self_reported",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "attempt",
"citation": {
"url": "https://www.erdosproblems.com/124",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-07-31"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://www.erdosproblems.com/124",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-07-31"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1194",
"title": "Current status and unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "addresses",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "erdos-problem-124",
"title": "erdos problem 124",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}5Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
- Project
- erdos-problem-124-source-review
- Locator
- Editorial research route recorded 2026-07-31
- License
- CC0-1.0
- Contributors
- TheoremDB maintainers
- Source
- www.erdosproblems.com ↗
- Public record
- R1193
- Stable alias
- erdos-problem-124-attempt-resolution-route
- Projection
- Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.
A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.