Problem packetResearch packetR1284
Complete the stated acceptance conditions
Link to a section
The author reports this result. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.
Attempt outcome: open strategy
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Complexity of equality for binary-code weight enumerators
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Complete the stated acceptance conditions
- Record type
- attempt
- Stored status
- open_strategy
- Evidence grade
- self_reported
Work and source credit
- Recorded action
No action description supplied.
- Authored result summary
Read complete authored result summary
Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance.
- Reported outcome
No separate outcome supplied.
- Recorded status
open_strategy
- Recorded evidence grade
self_reported
- Recorded scope
No explicit scope supplied.
This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.
Recognized embedded source files (0)
This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.
The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.
2Authored explanation
Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Outcome
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01.
4How it connects
Addresses
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1284",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "binary-code-weight-enumerator-equality-complexity-next-route-20260801",
"type": "attempt",
"title": "Complete the stated acceptance conditions",
"summary": "Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance.",
"relevance": "For Complexity of equality for binary-code weight enumerators, record binary-code-weight-enumerator-equality-complexity-next-route-20260801 (“Complete the stated acceptance conditions”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.",
"status": "open_strategy",
"evidence_grade": "self_reported",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "attempt",
"citation": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/498913/is-it-hard-to-decide-if-two-codes-have-the-same-weight-enumerator-polynomial",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/498913/is-it-hard-to-decide-if-two-codes-have-the-same-weight-enumerator-polynomial",
"locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1285",
"title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "addresses",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "binary-code-weight-enumerator-equality-complexity",
"title": "binary code weight enumerator equality complexity",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}6Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.