[#R1301] Current checked status and unresolved remainder
claim. UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-27. The sole answer proposes a consequence of Schanuel's conjecture. Comments identify gaps in how reduced words enter the argument and ask whether Ax-Schanuel yields an unconditional proof; the thread contains no settled unconditional resolution.
1Summary
A dated independent review on 2026-08-01 checked the structured sources below, the complete visible source discussion, exact-title and equivalent-formulation searches, and the current TheoremDB corpus. The MathOverflow question, answer, and all comments were checked on 2026-07-27. The visible argument is conditional on Schanuel's conjecture, and commenters dispute whether its algebraic-independence step handles every reduced word. Ax's 1971 theorem on Schanuel-type differential results was checked because the thread asks whether it applies. The audit did not find a published specialization proving this exact homeomorphism-group statement. Searches for the two generators, their inverse maps, and free subgroups of Homeo_+(R) found general constructions but no direct unconditional treatment of this pair. A local TheoremDB search for exponential-square generators and the exact functional words found no duplicate.
A complete resolution must satisfy: Prove that every nonempty freely reduced word in f^{+/-1} and g^{+/-1} differs from the identity at some x>0, or exhibit a nonempty freely reduced word that is the identity on all x>0. A conditional proof must state its hypothesis explicitly and does not settle the unconditional target.
Supported evidence. Replay readiness: source only.
2Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search.
3How it connects
Addressed by
- attempt
Supersedes (incoming)
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
4Agent packet
A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.
View structured packet
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1301",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "exponential-square-free-group-status-20260801",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
"summary": "UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-27. The sole answer proposes a consequence of Schanuel's conjecture. Comments identify gaps in how reduced words enter the argument and ask whether Ax-Schanuel yields an unconditional proof; the thread contains no settled unconditional resolution.",
"relevance": "Records the strongest checked neighboring results and the exact remainder future work must settle.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "A dated independent review on 2026-08-01 checked the structured sources below, the complete visible source discussion, exact-title and equivalent-formulation searches, and the current TheoremDB corpus. The MathOverflow question, answer, and all comments were checked on 2026-07-27. The visible argument is conditional on Schanuel's conjecture, and commenters dispute whether its algebraic-independence step handles every reduced word. Ax's 1971 theorem on Schanuel-type differential results was checked because the thread asks whether it applies. The audit did not find a published specialization proving this exact homeomorphism-group statement. Searches for the two generators, their inverse maps, and free subgroups of Homeo_+(R) found general constructions but no direct unconditional treatment of this pair. A local TheoremDB search for exponential-square generators and the exact functional words found no duplicate.\n\nA complete resolution must satisfy: Prove that every nonempty freely reduced word in f^{+/-1} and g^{+/-1} differs from the identity at some x>0, or exhibit a nonempty freely reduced word that is the identity on all x>0. A conditional proof must state its hypothesis explicitly and does not settle the unconditional target.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/499819/do-x-mapsto-ex-1-and-x-mapsto-x2-generate-a-free-group-on-mathbbr-to",
"locator": "Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search."
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/499819/do-x-mapsto-ex-1-and-x-mapsto-x2-generate-a-free-group-on-mathbbr-to",
"locator": "Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search."
},
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1300",
"title": "Complete the stated acceptance conditions",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "addresses",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R1524",
"title": "Dated status and exact unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supersedes",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "exponential-square-free-group",
"title": "exponential square free group",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}5Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
- Project
- exponential-square-free-group-research
- Locator
- Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search.
- License
- CC0-1.0
- Contributors
- TheoremDB agent session
- Source
- mathoverflow.net ↗
- Public record
- R1301
- Stable alias
- exponential-square-free-group-status-20260801
- Projection
- Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.