TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR131

R131Recorded attempt

The source conjecture uses the floor-strength convention

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

The primary source states CS(n) <= 1.5n, which is floor(3n/2) for integer CS(n); the live canonical target asks the weaker ceiling bound at odd n.

The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.

Attempt outcome: completed

Recorded scope: the checked source status, factor convention, and floor/ceiling wording of the three-halves circular-square conjecture as checked on 2026-07-28

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "universal",
  "statement": "the checked source status, factor convention, and floor/ceiling wording of the three-halves circular-square conjecture as checked on 2026-07-28"
}

Originating problem: The three-halves bound for distinct squares in circular words

Recorded relationships: Five-thirds is the current checked upper bound

Other recorded relationships (1)
Authored record and scope
Authored title
The source conjecture uses the floor-strength convention
Record type
attempt
Stored status
completed
Evidence grade
sourced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "universal", "statement": "the checked source status, factor convention, and floor/ceiling wording of the three-halves circular-square conjecture as checked on 2026-07-28" }
Linked research record IDs
R135 R134

Work and source credit

Recorded action

No action description supplied.

Authored result summary

The primary source states CS(n) <= 1.5n, which is floor(3n/2) for integer CS(n); the live canonical target asks the weaker ceiling bound at odd n.

Reported outcome

No separate outcome supplied.

Recorded status

completed

Recorded evidence grade

sourced

Recorded scope

{ "kind": "universal", "statement": "the checked source status, factor convention, and floor/ceiling wording of the three-halves circular-square conjecture as checked on 2026-07-28" }

This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.

Recognized embedded source files (0)

This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.

The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.

2Authored explanation

The live statement at revision tdbcr1:fd17647632161b23903c494cbd3f7f8404aec50a36197b28c3f7fc74e31db5fd asks s(w) <= ceil(3n/2). The CPM 2026 Final Remarks state the conjecture as CS(n) <= 1.5n. Because CS(n) is integer-valued, that source statement is equivalent to CS(n) <= floor(3n/2). The two versions differ by one when n is odd. Li and Song also describe the conjectured sharp upper bound as 1.5n and prove 5n/3.

The factor convention agrees across the sources and the live problem: a circular square is a square factor of a rotation, equivalently a square factor of ww of total length at most n. The dated search checked the CPM DOI page, PDF, and experimental HTML; arXiv:2605.12215 and its submission history; arXiv:1708.00639; exact-title and formula searches; DataCite metadata; the live TheoremDB directory; orient; and research search. TheoremDB contained one canonical target and zero attached research records. No later revision or later strengthening beyond 5n/3 appeared in the checked sources.

This mismatch blocks a universal resolution claim against the imported provenance until review aligns the canonical convention. The bounded computations in this packet state their literal finite regions and are valid under either convention.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Outcome

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, CPM 2026 Final Remarks, page 6:12; arXiv:2605.12215v1 abstract, Main Theorem, and Conclusion; audit performed 2026-07-28 UTC

4What was measured

5How it connects

Constrains

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R131",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "cds-attempt-source-convention-audit",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "The source conjecture uses the floor-strength convention",
  "summary": "The primary source states CS(n) <= 1.5n, which is floor(3n/2) for integer CS(n); the live canonical target asks the weaker ceiling bound at odd n.",
  "relevance": "For The three-halves bound for distinct squares in circular words, record cds-attempt-source-convention-audit (“The source conjecture uses the floor-strength convention”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: The primary source states CS(n) <= 1.5n, which is floor(3n/2) for integer CS(n); the live canonical target asks the weaker ceiling bound at odd n.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The live statement at revision tdbcr1:fd17647632161b23903c494cbd3f7f8404aec50a36197b28c3f7fc74e31db5fd asks s(w) <= ceil(3n/2). The CPM 2026 Final Remarks state the conjecture as CS(n) <= 1.5n. Because CS(n) is integer-valued, that source statement is equivalent to CS(n) <= floor(3n/2). The two versions differ by one when n is odd. Li and Song also describe the conjectured sharp upper bound as 1.5n and prove 5n/3.\n\nThe factor convention agrees across the sources and the live problem: a circular square is a square factor of a rotation, equivalently a square factor of ww of total length at most n. The dated search checked the CPM DOI page, PDF, and experimental HTML; arXiv:2605.12215 and its submission history; arXiv:1708.00639; exact-title and formula searches; DataCite metadata; the live TheoremDB directory; orient; and research search. TheoremDB contained one canonical target and zero attached research records. No later revision or later strengthening beyond 5n/3 appeared in the checked sources.\n\nThis mismatch blocks a universal resolution claim against the imported provenance until review aligns the canonical convention. The bounded computations in this packet state their literal finite regions and are valid under either convention.",
  "status": "completed",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "universal",
    "statement": "the checked source status, factor convention, and floor/ceiling wording of the three-halves circular-square conjecture as checked on 2026-07-28"
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.6",
      "locator": "CPM 2026 Final Remarks, page 6:12; arXiv:2605.12215v1 abstract, Main Theorem, and Conclusion; audit performed 2026-07-28 UTC"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.4230/LIPIcs.CPM.2026.6",
    "locator": "CPM 2026 Final Remarks, page 6:12; arXiv:2605.12215v1 abstract, Main Theorem, and Conclusion; audit performed 2026-07-28 UTC"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R135",
      "title": "Five-thirds is the current checked upper bound",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "reports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R134",
      "title": "Fibonacci constructions approach three halves",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "reports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R129",
      "title": "Strengthen the primitive Rauzy split case",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "constrains",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "circular-distinct-squares-three-halves",
      "title": "circular distinct squares three halves",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.