TheoremDB

Problem packetWorkR132

R132claimStatus: supportedEvidence: ReproducedReplay: source onlyexhaustive over its scope

[#R132] Exact binary maxima through length twenty-six

claim. Two exhaustive binary programs agree on total, short-square, long-square, primitive, and nonprimitive maxima for every length through 26.

View evidence

1Summary

Fixing the first bit to 0 identifies each binary word with its complement and still covers every binary word. Two independent programs exhaust this space through n=26. The total maxima for n=1,...,26 are [0,1,1,2,3,4,4,6,6,9,8,10,11,13,13,16,15,18,17,19,21,22,22,25,24,28].

The maxima restricted to primitive words are [0,0,1,2,3,3,4,6,6,7,8,10,11,11,13,15,15,17,17,19,21,20,22,24,24,26]. For nonprimitive words they are undefined at n=1 and then [1,1,2,2,4,3,6,4,9,5,9,6,13,9,16,8,18,9,19,13,22,11,25,14,28].

Reproduced evidence. Recorded scope: every binary word of lengths 1 through 26, with complements identified.

2Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: Two independent exhaustive binary C++17 enumerations executed 2026-07-28; source-family comparison against arXiv:1708.00639, Section 3, Lemma 1

3Overview

The maxima restricted to square factors of total length at most n/2 are [0,0,0,2,2,2,2,4,4,5,5,9,8,10,9,12,12,13,13,16,16,17,18,19,20,20]. The complementary long-square maxima are [0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,6,7,6,7,9,11,10,11,14,13,13,17,16,17,20,19,20].

At n=16 and n=24, the exact total maxima 16 and 25 are attained by rotations of the k=0 and k=1 words in Amit and Gawrychowski's 2017 family. Their Lemma 1 gives 10k+16-(k mod 2) squares at length 8k+16. The region beyond n=14 is binary-only and makes no claim about larger alphabets.

4What was measured

Lengths
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26
Exact binary maxima
0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4, 4, 6, 6, 9, 8, 10, 11, 13, 13, 16, 15, 18, 17, 19, 21, 22, 22, 25, 24, 28
Exact binary primitive maxima
0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4, 6, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, 11, 13, 15, 15, 17, 17, 19, 21, 20, 22, 24, 24, 26
Short square definition
total square length <= n/2
Exact binary short maxima
0, 0, 0, 2, 2, 2, 2, 4, 4, 5, 5, 9, 8, 10, 9, 12, 12, 13, 13, 16, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 20
Exact binary long maxima
0, 1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3, 4, 4, 6, 7, 6, 7, 9, 11, 10, 11, 14, 13, 13, 17, 16, 17, 20, 19, 20
First total maximizer
0, 00, 000, 0000, 01010, 010010, 0101000, 01010010, 010001000, 0101001010, 01001000100, 010010001000, 0101001010010, 01001000100100, 010001000010000, 0101001001010010, 01001000010001000, 010001000010001000, 0100001001000010000, 01000010001000010000, 010101010010101001010, 0100001000001000010000, 01000001000100000100000, 010101001010010101001010, 0100001000000100000100000, 01010010100100101001010010
Words examined mod complement at length 26
33,554,432
Normalized independent output sha256
1d5976f1b85dfa11ce67701e6dfe7cf5dadbe470719821d2bb7de00019f3cf18

Secondary source

urlhttps://arxiv.org/abs/1708.00639locatorSection 3, Lemma 1 and Figure 1pdf sha256a5ff67d9f53b4656689b9f9f6f1eb23e5d7c6d4f62dae011a910e2f65673783c

5How it connects

Evidenced by

Informs

Recorded for

6Agent packet

A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.

View structured packet
json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R132",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "cds-claim-binary-maxima-through-twenty-six",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Exact binary maxima through length twenty-six",
  "summary": "Two exhaustive binary programs agree on total, short-square, long-square, primitive, and nonprimitive maxima for every length through 26.",
  "relevance": "For The three-halves bound for distinct squares in circular words, record cds-claim-binary-maxima-through-twenty-six (“Exact binary maxima through length twenty-six”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Two exhaustive binary programs agree on total, short-square, long-square, primitive, and nonprimitive maxima for every length through 26.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Fixing the first bit to 0 identifies each binary word with its complement and still covers every binary word. Two independent programs exhaust this space through n=26. The total maxima for n=1,...,26 are\n[0,1,1,2,3,4,4,6,6,9,8,10,11,13,13,16,15,18,17,19,21,22,22,25,24,28].\n\nThe maxima restricted to primitive words are\n[0,0,1,2,3,3,4,6,6,7,8,10,11,11,13,15,15,17,17,19,21,20,22,24,24,26].\nFor nonprimitive words they are undefined at n=1 and then\n[1,1,2,2,4,3,6,4,9,5,9,6,13,9,16,8,18,9,19,13,22,11,25,14,28].\n\nThe maxima restricted to square factors of total length at most n/2 are\n[0,0,0,2,2,2,2,4,4,5,5,9,8,10,9,12,12,13,13,16,16,17,18,19,20,20].\nThe complementary long-square maxima are\n[0,1,1,2,2,3,3,4,4,6,7,6,7,9,11,10,11,14,13,13,17,16,17,20,19,20].\n\nAt n=16 and n=24, the exact total maxima 16 and 25 are attained by rotations of the k=0 and k=1 words in Amit and Gawrychowski's 2017 family. Their Lemma 1 gives 10k+16-(k mod 2) squares at length 8k+16. The region beyond n=14 is binary-only and makes no claim about larger alphabets.",
  "status": "supported",
  "evidence_grade": "computational",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "every binary word of lengths 1 through 26, with complements identified",
    "bounds": {
      "word_length": {
        "min": 1,
        "max": 26
      },
      "alphabet_size": {
        "min": 2,
        "max": 2
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": true
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "locator": "Two independent exhaustive binary C++17 enumerations executed 2026-07-28; source-family comparison against arXiv:1708.00639, Section 3, Lemma 1"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": null,
    "locator": "Two independent exhaustive binary C++17 enumerations executed 2026-07-28; source-family comparison against arXiv:1708.00639, Section 3, Lemma 1"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R125",
      "title": "Packed binary enumeration through length twenty-six",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R124",
      "title": "Direct-string independent binary replay",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R129",
      "title": "Strengthen the primitive Rauzy split case",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "circular-distinct-squares-three-halves",
      "title": "circular distinct squares three halves",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details
Project
circular-distinct-squares-three-halves-research
Locator
Two independent exhaustive binary C++17 enumerations executed 2026-07-28; source-family comparison against arXiv:1708.00639, Section 3, Lemma 1
License
CC0-1.0
Public record
R132
Stable alias
cds-claim-binary-maxima-through-twenty-six
Projection
Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.