[#R1338] Current checked status and unresolved remainder
claim. UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-27. The MathOverflow page has zero answers. Literature gives strong nonexistence conditions and classifications tied to perfect codes, but the dated search did not locate a classification of every parameter triple having the stated integral-root property.
1Summary
A dated independent review on 2026-08-01 checked the structured sources below, the complete visible source discussion, exact-title and equivalent-formulation searches, and the current TheoremDB corpus. On 2026-07-27 the Stack Exchange API reported zero answers, no accepted answer, and no closure for MathOverflow question 134715; the page contains no comments proposing a later resolution. Krasikov and Litsyn's 1996 work gives nonexistence conditions and upper bounds for integral zeros of binary Krawtchouk polynomials, a closely related partial result rather than the requested all-parameter classification. Shi, Krotov, and Solé, arXiv:2601.12818, restate Lloyd's integral-root condition as a central necessary tool for perfect-code classification; their broader association-scheme work does not classify all triples in this statement. A TheoremDB search for Lloyd polynomials, integral Krawtchouk zeros, and q-ary perfect-code root conditions found no duplicate.
A complete resolution must satisfy: Give a necessary-and-sufficient classification of all triples (q,n,t), with a proof that every listed polynomial has the required roots and every omitted triple fails at least one requirement. A computational component must use exact rational polynomial arithmetic and provide certificates for factorization, root integrality, distinctness, and the finite parameter ranges it eliminates.
Supported evidence. Replay readiness: source only.
2Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search.
3How it connects
Addressed by
- attempt
Supersedes (incoming)
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
4Agent packet
A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.
View structured packet
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1338",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "lloyd-polynomial-integral-root-classification-status-20260801",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
"summary": "UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-27. The MathOverflow page has zero answers. Literature gives strong nonexistence conditions and classifications tied to perfect codes, but the dated search did not locate a classification of every parameter triple having the stated integral-root property.",
"relevance": "Records the strongest checked neighboring results and the exact remainder future work must settle.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "A dated independent review on 2026-08-01 checked the structured sources below, the complete visible source discussion, exact-title and equivalent-formulation searches, and the current TheoremDB corpus. On 2026-07-27 the Stack Exchange API reported zero answers, no accepted answer, and no closure for MathOverflow question 134715; the page contains no comments proposing a later resolution. Krasikov and Litsyn's 1996 work gives nonexistence conditions and upper bounds for integral zeros of binary Krawtchouk polynomials, a closely related partial result rather than the requested all-parameter classification. Shi, Krotov, and Solé, arXiv:2601.12818, restate Lloyd's integral-root condition as a central necessary tool for perfect-code classification; their broader association-scheme work does not classify all triples in this statement. A TheoremDB search for Lloyd polynomials, integral Krawtchouk zeros, and q-ary perfect-code root conditions found no duplicate.\n\nA complete resolution must satisfy: Give a necessary-and-sufficient classification of all triples (q,n,t), with a proof that every listed polynomial has the required roots and every omitted triple fails at least one requirement. A computational component must use exact rational polynomial arithmetic and provide certificates for factorization, root integrality, distinctness, and the finite parameter ranges it eliminates.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/134715/when-does-the-lloyd-polynomial-have-only-integral-roots",
"locator": "Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search."
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/134715/when-does-the-lloyd-polynomial-have-only-integral-roots",
"locator": "Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search."
},
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1337",
"title": "Complete the stated acceptance conditions",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "addresses",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R1636",
"title": "Dated status and exact unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supersedes",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "lloyd-polynomial-integral-root-classification",
"title": "lloyd polynomial integral root classification",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}5Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
- Project
- lloyd-polynomial-integral-root-classification-research
- Locator
- Dataset references and independent 2026-08-01 status search.
- License
- CC0-1.0
- Contributors
- TheoremDB agent session
- Source
- mathoverflow.net ↗
- Public record
- R1338
- Stable alias
- lloyd-polynomial-integral-root-classification-status-20260801
- Projection
- Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.