TheoremDB
R1355attemptStatus: open strategyEvidence: ReportedReplay: source only

[#R1355] Complete the stated acceptance conditions

View evidenceOpen source ↗

1Summary

Prove both relative-consistency directions between \(\mathsf{ZFC}\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration.

Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Prove both relative-consistency directions between \(\mathsf{ZFC}\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.

Reported evidence. Replay readiness: source only.

2Outcome

Evidence package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01.

3How it connects

Addresses

Recorded for

4Agent packet

A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.

View structured packet
json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1355",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength-next-route-20260801",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "Complete the stated acceptance conditions",
  "summary": "Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration.",
  "relevance": "For Consistency strength of projective Ramsey regularity, record projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength-next-route-20260801 (“Complete the stated acceptance conditions”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Work against the displayed statement and preserve every hypothesis and quantifier. Prove both relative-consistency directions between \\(\\mathsf{ZFC}\\) plus projective Ramsey regularity and a precisely stated standard large-cardinal theory, thereby fixing the exact consistency strength. For the named subquestion, prove equiconsistency with one inaccessible cardinal or give strictly sharper matching upper and lower bounds that refute that calibration. Any computation must retain a replayable witness and a matching exclusion or completeness certificate.",
  "status": "open_strategy",
  "evidence_grade": "self_reported",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/76280/exact-consistency-strength-of-all-projective-sets-are-ramsey",
      "locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/76280/exact-consistency-strength-of-all-projective-sets-are-ramsey",
    "locator": "Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01."
  },
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1356",
      "title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "addresses",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength",
      "title": "projective sets ramsey consistency strength",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

5Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details
Project
projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength-research
Locator
Editorial research route recorded 2026-08-01.
License
CC0-1.0
Contributors
TheoremDB agent session
Public record
R1355
Stable alias
projective-sets-ramsey-consistency-strength-next-route-20260801
Projection
Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.