Problem packetWorkR1550
[#R1550] Dated status and exact unresolved remainder
claim. Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open. Exact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.
1Summary
The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.
Strongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open.
Supported evidence. Replay readiness: source only.
2Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: doi.org ↗, section 4, especially the corollaries of Theorem 2 on pages 87-88
3Overview
Exact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.
4What was measured
- As of
- 2026-08-01
- Strongest known result
- The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open.
- Exact open remainder
- For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.
5How it connects
Supersedes
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
6Agent packet
A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.
View structured packet
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1550",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "four-exponentials-conjecture-status-packet-quality-20260801",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Dated status and exact unresolved remainder",
"summary": "Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open. Exact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.",
"relevance": "For Four exponentials conjecture, this successor gives readable dated status prose and the exact remaining research boundary.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.\n\nStrongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open.\n\nExact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-14-1-73-88",
"locator": "section 4, especially the corollaries of Theorem 2 on pages 87-88"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-14-1-73-88",
"locator": "section 4, especially the corollaries of Theorem 2 on pages 87-88"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1064",
"title": "Current status and unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supersedes",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "four-exponentials-conjecture",
"title": "four exponentials conjecture",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
- Project
- four-exponentials-conjecture-source-review
- Locator
- section 4, especially the corollaries of Theorem 2 on pages 87-88
- License
- CC0-1.0
- Contributors
- TheoremDB maintainers
- Source
- doi.org ↗
- Public record
- R1550
- Stable alias
- four-exponentials-conjecture-status-packet-quality-20260801
- Projection
- Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.