Problem packetResearch packetR167
The least-prime-factor formula holds for every heap
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: established
Recorded scope: every positive heap size in the unequal coprime splitting game
Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
"kind": "universal",
"statement": "every positive heap size in the unequal coprime splitting game"
}Originating problem: Smallest-prime-factor formula for a coprime splitting game
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- The least-prime-factor formula holds for every heap
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- established
- Evidence grade
- sourced
- Recorded scope data
- { "kind": "universal", "statement": "every positive heap size in the unequal coprime splitting game" }
2Authored explanation
Write \(P(n)\) for the least prime divisor of \(n>1\). The proposed formula has the simpler unified form \[ g(1)=0,\qquad g(n)=\pi(P(n))-1\quad(n\geq2). \] Indeed, an even \(n\) has \(P(n)=2\), so the second expression gives zero.
We prove the formula by strong induction. The heaps 1 and 2 have no legal split, since the sole positive split of 2 is \(1+1\), whose parts are equal. Hence both values are zero.
Suppose first that \(n>2\) is even. A legal split \(n=a+b\) has two odd summands, since two even summands would have a common factor 2. If one summand is 1, its value is zero and the other summand is an odd integer greater than 1 with positive value. If both exceed 1 and had equal Grundy values, the induction formula and the injectivity of the prime-counting index on primes would give \(P(a)=P(b)\). That prime would divide \(\gcd(a,b)\), contrary to legality. Thus \(g(a)\mathbin{\mathrm{xor}}g(b)\neq0\) for every option. Zero is absent from the option-value set, so its mex is zero.
Now let \(n>1\) be odd, put \(p=P(n)\), and set \(k=\pi(p)-1\). Every split has one odd summand \(m\) and one even summand \(n-m\). The induction result makes the even summand's value zero, and \[ \gcd(m,n-m)=\gcd(m,n). \] Consequently the option values are exactly the values \(g(m)\) for odd \(m\) with \(1\leq m\leq n-2\) and \(\gcd(m,n)=1\).
The option \(m=1\) realizes value 0. For each \(j\) with \(1\leq j<k\), let \(q\) be the \((j+1)\)-st prime. Then \(q<p\), so \(q\leq p-2\leq n-2\) and \(\gcd(q,n)=1\). The induction formula gives \(g(q)=\pi(q)-1=j\). Every value below \(k\) therefore occurs.
Value \(k\) cannot occur. If a legal odd summand \(m>1\) had \(g(m)=k\), induction would give \(\pi(P(m))=\pi(p)\), hence \(P(m)=p\). Then \(p\) would divide both \(m\) and \(n\), contradicting \(\gcd(m,n)=1\). The option values contain every integer below \(k\) and exclude \(k\), so their mex is \(k\). This completes the induction.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: math.colgate.edu ↗, Self-contained proof in this record; compare Iannucci and Larsson, Game values of arithmetic functions, Integers 21B (2021), Article A14, Theorem 5 for the analogous totative game
4What was measured
Formula
Consequences
Proof obligations
5How it connects
Informed by
- claim
Tested by
- artifact
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R167",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "csgf-claim-universal-formula",
"type": "claim",
"title": "The least-prime-factor formula holds for every heap",
"summary": "If P(n) is the least prime divisor of n, then g(1)=0 and g(n)=pi(P(n))-1 for every n at least 2.",
"relevance": "This records a result, observation, or conjecture used to assess the target problem.",
"relevance_source": "derived",
"body": "Write \\(P(n)\\) for the least prime divisor of \\(n>1\\). The proposed formula has the simpler unified form\n\\[\n g(1)=0,\\qquad g(n)=\\pi(P(n))-1\\quad(n\\geq2).\n\\]\nIndeed, an even \\(n\\) has \\(P(n)=2\\), so the second expression gives zero.\n\nWe prove the formula by strong induction. The heaps 1 and 2 have no legal split, since the sole positive split of 2 is \\(1+1\\), whose parts are equal. Hence both values are zero.\n\nSuppose first that \\(n>2\\) is even. A legal split \\(n=a+b\\) has two odd summands, since two even summands would have a common factor 2. If one summand is 1, its value is zero and the other summand is an odd integer greater than 1 with positive value. If both exceed 1 and had equal Grundy values, the induction formula and the injectivity of the prime-counting index on primes would give \\(P(a)=P(b)\\). That prime would divide \\(\\gcd(a,b)\\), contrary to legality. Thus \\(g(a)\\mathbin{\\mathrm{xor}}g(b)\\neq0\\) for every option. Zero is absent from the option-value set, so its mex is zero.\n\nNow let \\(n>1\\) be odd, put \\(p=P(n)\\), and set \\(k=\\pi(p)-1\\). Every split has one odd summand \\(m\\) and one even summand \\(n-m\\). The induction result makes the even summand's value zero, and\n\\[\n \\gcd(m,n-m)=\\gcd(m,n).\n\\]\nConsequently the option values are exactly the values \\(g(m)\\) for odd \\(m\\) with \\(1\\leq m\\leq n-2\\) and \\(\\gcd(m,n)=1\\).\n\nThe option \\(m=1\\) realizes value 0. For each \\(j\\) with \\(1\\leq j<k\\), let \\(q\\) be the \\((j+1)\\)-st prime. Then \\(q<p\\), so \\(q\\leq p-2\\leq n-2\\) and \\(\\gcd(q,n)=1\\). The induction formula gives \\(g(q)=\\pi(q)-1=j\\). Every value below \\(k\\) therefore occurs.\n\nValue \\(k\\) cannot occur. If a legal odd summand \\(m>1\\) had \\(g(m)=k\\), induction would give \\(\\pi(P(m))=\\pi(p)\\), hence \\(P(m)=p\\). Then \\(p\\) would divide both \\(m\\) and \\(n\\), contradicting \\(\\gcd(m,n)=1\\). The option values contain every integer below \\(k\\) and exclude \\(k\\), so their mex is \\(k\\). This completes the induction.",
"status": "established",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": {
"kind": "universal",
"statement": "every positive heap size in the unequal coprime splitting game"
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://math.colgate.edu/~integers/vb14/vb14.pdf",
"locator": "Self-contained proof in this record; compare Iannucci and Larsson, Game values of arithmetic functions, Integers 21B (2021), Article A14, Theorem 5 for the analogous totative game"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://math.colgate.edu/~integers/vb14/vb14.pdf",
"locator": "Self-contained proof in this record; compare Iannucci and Larsson, Game values of arithmetic functions, Integers 21B (2021), Article A14, Theorem 5 for the analogous totative game"
},
"models": [],
"continuation": null,
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R166",
"title": "The Grundy sequence is a shifted A055396",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "informs",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R165",
"title": "Exact recurrence sweep through 30,000",
"object_type": "artifact",
"relation": "tests",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "coprime-splitting-grundy-formula",
"title": "coprime splitting grundy formula",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.