Problem packetWorkR352
[#R352] Exhaustive search cost multiplies by about 4.6 per vertex
claim. Search nodes per size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531. Cost grows by a factor of 4.6 per vertex while the tree count grows by 2.4.
1Summary
Backtracking nodes used by the graceful search, by tree size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531.
Over that range the node count grows by 4.6 per vertex (the last single step is 6.5), against a tree-count growth of 2.4. The per-tree cost is rising as well as the number of trees.
Reproduced evidence. Recorded scope: search cost measured on trees of 10 to 15 vertices.
2Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15
3Overview
Carrying that factor from n=15 to the published bound of 35 vertices means roughly 2e+13 times the work of the run recorded here. A plain exhaustive sweep does not reach that bound, which is consistent with the published verification having used constraint propagation and randomized search. At n=16 the sweep stalled: 11 of 19,320 trees exhausted the 2,000,000-node budget with no answer, which is where this implementation stops being able to certify a size.
4What was measured
Search nodes by n
5How it connects
Constrains
- attempt
Evidenced by
- artifact
Recorded for
- problem
6Agent packet
A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.
View structured packet
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R352",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "gtc-claim-search-cost",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Exhaustive search cost multiplies by about 4.6 per vertex",
"summary": "Search nodes per size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531. Cost grows by a factor of 4.6 per vertex while the tree count grows by 2.4.",
"relevance": "For Graceful tree conjecture, record gtc-claim-search-cost (“Exhaustive search cost multiplies by about 4.6 per vertex”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Search nodes per size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Backtracking nodes used by the graceful search, by tree size: n=10: 8,264, n=11: 28,462, n=12: 97,710, n=13: 587,455, n=14: 2,503,495, n=15: 16,305,531.\n\nOver that range the node count grows by 4.6 per vertex (the last single step is 6.5), against a tree-count growth of 2.4. The per-tree cost is rising as well as the number of trees.\n\nCarrying that factor from n=15 to the published bound of 35 vertices means roughly 2e+13 times the work of the run recorded here. A plain exhaustive sweep does not reach that bound, which is consistent with the published verification having used constraint propagation and randomized search. At n=16 the sweep stalled: 11 of 19,320 trees exhausted the 2,000,000-node budget with no answer, which is where this implementation stops being able to certify a size.",
"status": "reproduced",
"evidence_grade": "reproduced",
"scope": {
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "search cost measured on trees of 10 to 15 vertices",
"bounds": {
"n": {
"max": 15,
"min": 10
}
},
"exhaustive": true
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1564",
"locator": "research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/1403.1564",
"locator": "research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R344",
"title": "Settle the conjecture by extending exhaustive verification",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "constrains",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "R341",
"title": "Search cost by tree size",
"object_type": "artifact",
"relation": "evidences",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "graceful-tree-conjecture",
"title": "graceful tree conjecture",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
- Project
- graceful-tree-conjecture
- Locator
- research/graceful-trees/checks.py --max-n 15
- License
- CC-BY-4.0
- Contributors
- Philip Weiss, TheoremDB graceful-tree reproduction
- Source
- arxiv.org ↗
- Public record
- R352
- Stable alias
- gtc-claim-search-cost
- Projection
- Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.