TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR484

R484Recorded attempt

Published theory gives 132; the current enumeration report gives 133

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Schönhage's theorem is an independently checkable floor, while Clift's reported Hamming-weight sweep raises it by one.

The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.

Attempt outcome: completed

Recorded scope: lower bounds for the ordinary addition-chain length of N=2^127-1

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "lower bounds for the ordinary addition-chain length of N=2^127-1",
  "bounds": {
    "mersenne_exponent": {
      "min": 127,
      "max": 127
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": false
}

Originating problem: Shortest addition chain for the 127th Mersenne number

Recorded relationships: The strongest located interval is 133 through 136

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Published theory gives 132; the current enumeration report gives 133
Record type
attempt
Stored status
completed
Evidence grade
sourced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "lower bounds for the ordinary addition-chain length of N=2^127-1", "bounds": { "mersenne_exponent": { "min": 127, "max": 127 } }, "exhaustive": false }
Linked research record IDs
R486

Work and source credit

Recorded action

No action description supplied.

Authored result summary

Schönhage's theorem is an independently checkable floor, while Clift's reported Hamming-weight sweep raises it by one.

Reported outcome

No separate outcome supplied.

Recorded status

completed

Recorded evidence grade

sourced

Recorded scope
Read complete recorded scope

{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "lower bounds for the ordinary addition-chain length of N=2^127-1", "bounds": { "mersenne_exponent": { "min": 127, "max": 127 } }, "exhaustive": false }

This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.

Recognized embedded source files (0)

This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.

The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.

2Authored explanation

Schönhage proved \[ \ell(n)\geq\log_2 n+\log_2\nu(n)-2.13, \] where \(\nu(n)\) is the number of ones in the binary expansion. Substitution of \(N=2^{127}-1\) and \(\nu(N)=127\) gives a right side of approximately \(131.8586846868\). Since chain length is integral, \[ \ell(N)\geq132. \] This is the strongest lower endpoint reproduced here solely from a peer-reviewed universal theorem.

The Knuth-Stolarsky inequality asserts \[ \ell(n)\geq\lambda(n)+\lceil\log_2\nu(n)\rceil. \] Flammenkamp's maintained database reports that Neill Clift completed an exhaustive verification for every target with \(\nu(n)\leq128\) in November 2023. Applying the reported result to the present target gives 133. The same page distinguishes this finite verified range from the unresolved universal conjecture.

Brauer's 1939 paper supplies the star-chain construction behind the upper endpoint. Clift's 2011 paper gives an exact-search framework for point values, and the current additionchains.com site documents ongoing computations. The audit found no peer-reviewed or database entry settling \(\ell(2^{127}-1)\), and no shorter explicit chain than the 136-step construction recorded here.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Outcome

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, Arnold Schönhage, A lower bound for the length of addition chains, Theoretical Computer Science 1(1), 1975, pages 1-12; Achim Flammenkamp, Shortest Addition Chains, current Conjectures section; Neill M. Clift, Calculating optimal addition chains, Computing 91, 2011, pages 265-284

4What was measured

5How it connects

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R484",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "m127ac-attempt-lower-bound-audit",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "Published theory gives 132; the current enumeration report gives 133",
  "summary": "Schönhage's theorem is an independently checkable floor, while Clift's reported Hamming-weight sweep raises it by one.",
  "relevance": "For Shortest addition chain for the 127th Mersenne number, record m127ac-attempt-lower-bound-audit (“Published theory gives 132; the current enumeration report gives 133”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: Schönhage's theorem is an independently checkable floor, while Clift's reported Hamming-weight sweep raises it by one.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Schönhage proved\n\\[\n\\ell(n)\\geq\\log_2 n+\\log_2\\nu(n)-2.13,\n\\]\nwhere \\(\\nu(n)\\) is the number of ones in the binary expansion. Substitution of \\(N=2^{127}-1\\) and \\(\\nu(N)=127\\) gives a right side of approximately \\(131.8586846868\\). Since chain length is integral,\n\\[\n\\ell(N)\\geq132.\n\\]\nThis is the strongest lower endpoint reproduced here solely from a peer-reviewed universal theorem.\n\nThe Knuth-Stolarsky inequality asserts\n\\[\n\\ell(n)\\geq\\lambda(n)+\\lceil\\log_2\\nu(n)\\rceil.\n\\]\nFlammenkamp's maintained database reports that Neill Clift completed an exhaustive verification for every target with \\(\\nu(n)\\leq128\\) in November 2023. Applying the reported result to the present target gives 133. The same page distinguishes this finite verified range from the unresolved universal conjecture.\n\nBrauer's 1939 paper supplies the star-chain construction behind the upper endpoint. Clift's 2011 paper gives an exact-search framework for point values, and the current additionchains.com site documents ongoing computations. The audit found no peer-reviewed or database entry settling \\(\\ell(2^{127}-1)\\), and no shorter explicit chain than the 136-step construction recorded here.",
  "status": "completed",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "lower bounds for the ordinary addition-chain length of N=2^127-1",
    "bounds": {
      "mersenne_exponent": {
        "min": 127,
        "max": 127
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": false
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(75)90008-0",
      "locator": "Arnold Schönhage, A lower bound for the length of addition chains, Theoretical Computer Science 1(1), 1975, pages 1-12; Achim Flammenkamp, Shortest Addition Chains, current Conjectures section; Neill M. Clift, Calculating optimal addition chains, Computing 91, 2011, pages 265-284"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3975(75)90008-0",
    "locator": "Arnold Schönhage, A lower bound for the length of addition chains, Theoretical Computer Science 1(1), 1975, pages 1-12; Achim Flammenkamp, Shortest Addition Chains, current Conjectures section; Neill M. Clift, Calculating optimal addition chains, Computing 91, 2011, pages 265-284"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R486",
      "title": "The strongest located interval is 133 through 136",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "mersenne-127-addition-chain",
      "title": "mersenne 127 addition chain",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.