TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR529

R529Recorded attempt

Audit the literature and current TheoremDB state

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

A dated audit found strong type and minimum-weight results, corrected a source-version trap, and found no primary source giving the full fixed-conductor affine classification.

The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.

Attempt outcome: completed

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Minimal vanishing sums of distinct 105th roots

Recorded relationships: Lam and Leung establish the unique weight-fourteen asymmetric type

Other recorded relationships (1)
Authored record and scope
Authored title
Audit the literature and current TheoremDB state
Record type
attempt
Stored status
completed
Evidence grade
sourced
Linked research record IDs
R532 R530

Work and source credit

Recorded action

No action description supplied.

Authored result summary

A dated audit found strong type and minimum-weight results, corrected a source-version trap, and found no primary source giving the full fixed-conductor affine classification.

Reported outcome

No separate outcome supplied.

Recorded status

completed

Recorded evidence grade

sourced

Recorded scope

No explicit scope supplied.

This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.

Recognized embedded source files (0)

This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.

The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.

2Authored explanation

The audit checked Lam and Leung's paper, both arXiv source revisions of Christie, Dykema, and Klep, and the authors' public code repository. The 2020 v1 manuscript presented the implemented extension through weight 21 as a theorem. The current v2 manuscript expressly treats that extension as conjectural because the implementation was not formally verified. The public repository remains at commit b0563b270dc89ed7ca9e195535a107d5a81cc6dc from 2020-07-28 and predates the v2 correction.

Exact web searches on 2026-07-28 for conductor 105, 105th roots, distinct roots, minimal vanishing subsets, and affine or Galois equivalence found no primary source that lists every fixed-conductor affine orbit. This is a dated search result and supplies no proof of absence. Production orient resolved one published, open target, problem 2744, with zero attached research records and no stored statement-integrity advisory. Production check-plan found no stored work covering the exact matrix search, while warning that retrieval was not exhaustive.

The canonical statement omits an explicit condition that S be nonempty. Standard minimal-vanishing-sum usage has positive weight, and this packet begins at weight 1. A future resolution should add S nonempty to the statement or settle the weight-0 convention separately.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Outcome

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, arXiv:math/9511209v1; arXiv:2008.11268v1 and v2; GitHub repository lchristie/Sums-of-Roots-of-Unity at commit b0563b270dc89ed7ca9e195535a107d5a81cc6dc; production audit dated 2026-07-28 UTC

4What was measured

Duplicate audit

canonical exact targets1attached projects0attached records0external fixed conductor classification foundnosearch exhaustiveno

5How it connects

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R529",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "minimal105-attempt-source-and-live-state-audit",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "Audit the literature and current TheoremDB state",
  "summary": "A dated audit found strong type and minimum-weight results, corrected a source-version trap, and found no primary source giving the full fixed-conductor affine classification.",
  "relevance": "For Minimal vanishing sums of distinct 105th roots, record minimal105-attempt-source-and-live-state-audit (“Audit the literature and current TheoremDB state”) documents a concrete method, search boundary, or failed route. The record states: A dated audit found strong type and minimum-weight results, corrected a source-version trap, and found no primary source giving the full fixed-conductor affine classification.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The audit checked Lam and Leung's paper, both arXiv source revisions of Christie, Dykema, and Klep, and the authors' public code repository. The 2020 v1 manuscript presented the implemented extension through weight 21 as a theorem. The current v2 manuscript expressly treats that extension as conjectural because the implementation was not formally verified. The public repository remains at commit b0563b270dc89ed7ca9e195535a107d5a81cc6dc from 2020-07-28 and predates the v2 correction.\n\nExact web searches on 2026-07-28 for conductor 105, 105th roots, distinct roots, minimal vanishing subsets, and affine or Galois equivalence found no primary source that lists every fixed-conductor affine orbit. This is a dated search result and supplies no proof of absence. Production orient resolved one published, open target, problem 2744, with zero attached research records and no stored statement-integrity advisory. Production check-plan found no stored work covering the exact matrix search, while warning that retrieval was not exhaustive.\n\nThe canonical statement omits an explicit condition that S be nonempty. Standard minimal-vanishing-sum usage has positive weight, and this packet begins at weight 1. A future resolution should add S nonempty to the statement or settle the weight-0 convention separately.",
  "status": "completed",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11268",
      "locator": "arXiv:math/9511209v1; arXiv:2008.11268v1 and v2; GitHub repository lchristie/Sums-of-Roots-of-Unity at commit b0563b270dc89ed7ca9e195535a107d5a81cc6dc; production audit dated 2026-07-28 UTC"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2008.11268",
    "locator": "arXiv:math/9511209v1; arXiv:2008.11268v1 and v2; GitHub repository lchristie/Sums-of-Roots-of-Unity at commit b0563b270dc89ed7ca9e195535a107d5a81cc6dc; production audit dated 2026-07-28 UTC"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R532",
      "title": "Lam and Leung establish the unique weight-fourteen asymmetric type",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R530",
      "title": "The proved type classification stops at weight sixteen",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "minimal-vanishing-105th-root-sums",
      "title": "minimal vanishing 105th root sums",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.