Problem packetResearch packetR652
The exact enumeration record ends at order 11
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: reported
Recorded scope: the published exact enumeration record for reduced Latin squares through order 12, audited on 2026-07-25
Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "the published exact enumeration record for reduced Latin squares through order 12, audited on 2026-07-25",
"bounds": {
"order": {
"min": 1,
"max": 12
}
},
"exhaustive": false
}Originating problem: Number of reduced Latin squares of order 12
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- The exact enumeration record ends at order 11
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- reported
- Evidence grade
- sourced
- Recorded scope data
- { "kind": "bounded", "statement": "the published exact enumeration record for reduced Latin squares through order 12, audited on 2026-07-25", "bounds": { "order": { "min": 1, "max": 12 } }, "exhaustive": false }
2Authored explanation
McKay and Wanless completed the exact enumeration through order 11. Their paper gives \(R_{11}=5363937773277371298119673540771840\) and says that the same graph-classification method was unlikely to reach \(R_{12}\) soon because there are more than \(10^{11}\) regular bipartite graphs of order 24 and degree 6.
McKay and Rogoyski had earlier reported a randomized estimate for order 12. Stones's 2010 survey explicitly says that \(R_{12}\) is unknown and lists the exact sequence only through order 11. A search on 2026-07-25 of the exact-count papers, the later order-11 class enumeration, the survey literature, and the current author-maintained count table found no subsequent exact value. The candidate therefore remains an open exact-enumeration problem.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: doi.org ↗, McKay and Wanless, On the Number of Latin Squares, Annals of Combinatorics 9 (2005), 335-344, Section 3 and Table 1; Douglas S. Stones, The Many Formulae for the Number of Latin Rectangles, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 17 (2010), #A1, Figure 1
4What was measured
5How it connects
Contextualizes (incoming)
- claim
Bounds (incoming)
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R652",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "rls12-claim-current-status",
"type": "claim",
"title": "The exact enumeration record ends at order 11",
"summary": "The exact value of R_12 remains open. The last published exact count is R_11, while the published order-12 figure is a randomized estimate.",
"relevance": "For Number of reduced Latin squares of order 12, record rls12-claim-current-status (“The exact enumeration record ends at order 11”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The exact value of R_12 remains open.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "McKay and Wanless completed the exact enumeration through order 11. Their paper gives \\(R_{11}=5363937773277371298119673540771840\\) and says that the same graph-classification method was unlikely to reach \\(R_{12}\\) soon because there are more than \\(10^{11}\\) regular bipartite graphs of order 24 and degree 6.\n\nMcKay and Rogoyski had earlier reported a randomized estimate for order 12. Stones's 2010 survey explicitly says that \\(R_{12}\\) is unknown and lists the exact sequence only through order 11. A search on 2026-07-25 of the exact-count papers, the later order-11 class enumeration, the survey literature, and the current author-maintained count table found no subsequent exact value. The candidate therefore remains an open exact-enumeration problem.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": {
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "the published exact enumeration record for reduced Latin squares through order 12, audited on 2026-07-25",
"bounds": {
"order": {
"min": 1,
"max": 12
}
},
"exhaustive": false
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-005-0261-7",
"locator": "McKay and Wanless, On the Number of Latin Squares, Annals of Combinatorics 9 (2005), 335-344, Section 3 and Table 1; Douglas S. Stones, The Many Formulae for the Number of Latin Rectangles, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 17 (2010), #A1, Figure 1"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-005-0261-7",
"locator": "McKay and Wanless, On the Number of Latin Squares, Annals of Combinatorics 9 (2005), 335-344, Section 3 and Table 1; Douglas S. Stones, The Many Formulae for the Number of Latin Rectangles, Electronic Journal of Combinatorics 17 (2010), #A1, Figure 1"
},
"models": [],
"continuation": null,
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R654",
"title": "The primary order-12 estimate is 1.62 times 10^44",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "contextualizes",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R655",
"title": "A rigorous elementary bracket contains the estimate",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "bounds",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "reduced-latin-squares-order-12",
"title": "reduced latin squares order 12",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.