Problem packetResearch packetR98
Existence at order 32 remains open
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: reported
Recorded scope: the published existence status of Costas arrays of order 32, checked on 2026-07-25
Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "the published existence status of Costas arrays of order 32, checked on 2026-07-25",
"bounds": {
"order": {
"min": 32,
"max": 32
}
},
"exhaustive": false
}Originating problem: Existence of a Costas array of order 32
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Existence at order 32 remains open
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- reported
- Evidence grade
- sourced
- Recorded scope data
- { "kind": "bounded", "statement": "the published existence status of Costas arrays of order 32, checked on 2026-07-25", "bounds": { "order": { "min": 32, "max": 32 } }, "exhaustive": false }
2Authored explanation
The candidate remains unresolved. Vulakh and Finkel describe order 32 as unsolved in their 2022 peer-reviewed paper. Their search produced near solutions rather than a Costas permutation. The 2022 paper `The Density of Costas Arrays Decays Exponentially` likewise states that existence at order 32 remains unknown.
A fresh 2026 paper by Gulec and Abolghasemi reports that exhaustive enumeration reaches order 29 and bases its higher-order experiments on Beard's public collection of known arrays. Beard's database page says that its generated collection reaches order 1030, while exhaustive-search additions stop at orders 28 and 29. These records provide a current cross-check against a published witness. Database absence cannot establish nonexistence.
The acceptance condition therefore remains unchanged. A positive resolution needs a 32-entry permutation whose 496 displacement vectors pass an exact duplicate check. A negative resolution needs an exhaustive search certificate that covers every symmetry class.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: doi.org ↗, David Vulakh and Raphael Finkel, Parallel m-dimensional relative ant colony optimization (mDRACO) for the Costas-array problem, Soft Computing 26 (2022), 5765-5772, Conclusion and Appendix
4What was measured
5How it connects
Informed by
- claim
Supported by
- attempt
Tested by
- artifact
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R98",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "ca32-claim-currently-open",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Existence at order 32 remains open",
"summary": "No verified order-32 Costas permutation or exhaustive nonexistence certificate was found in the audited primary literature.",
"relevance": "For Existence of a Costas array of order 32, record ca32-claim-currently-open (“Existence at order 32 remains open”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: No verified order-32 Costas permutation or exhaustive nonexistence certificate was found in the audited primary literature.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "The candidate remains unresolved. Vulakh and Finkel describe order 32 as unsolved in their 2022 peer-reviewed paper. Their search produced near solutions rather than a Costas permutation. The 2022 paper `The Density of Costas Arrays Decays Exponentially` likewise states that existence at order 32 remains unknown.\n\nA fresh 2026 paper by Gulec and Abolghasemi reports that exhaustive enumeration reaches order 29 and bases its higher-order experiments on Beard's public collection of known arrays. Beard's database page says that its generated collection reaches order 1030, while exhaustive-search additions stop at orders 28 and 29. These records provide a current cross-check against a published witness. Database absence cannot establish nonexistence.\n\nThe acceptance condition therefore remains unchanged. A positive resolution needs a 32-entry permutation whose 496 displacement vectors pass an exact duplicate check. A negative resolution needs an exhaustive search certificate that covers every symmetry class.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": {
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "the published existence status of Costas arrays of order 32, checked on 2026-07-25",
"bounds": {
"order": {
"min": 32,
"max": 32
}
},
"exhaustive": false
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06969-1",
"locator": "David Vulakh and Raphael Finkel, Parallel m-dimensional relative ant colony optimization (mDRACO) for the Costas-array problem, Soft Computing 26 (2022), 5765-5772, Conclusion and Appendix"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-022-06969-1",
"locator": "David Vulakh and Raphael Finkel, Parallel m-dimensional relative ant colony optimization (mDRACO) for the Costas-array problem, Soft Computing 26 (2022), 5765-5772, Conclusion and Appendix"
},
"models": [],
"continuation": null,
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R99",
"title": "The published heuristic search reached 17 violations",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "informs",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R97",
"title": "Standard construction and record audit",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "supports",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R96",
"title": "Exact Costas-permutation verifier",
"object_type": "artifact",
"relation": "tests",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "costas-array-order-32",
"title": "costas array order 32",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.