TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR1390

R1390Sourced evidence

Dated status and exact unresolved remainder

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: Evaluating weight enumerators and finding minimum distance have strong hardness results, while the recent MathOverflow thread gives no reduction or algorithm for equality of the full polynomials. Exact unresolved remainder: Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: reported

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Complexity of equality for binary-code weight enumerators

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Dated status and exact unresolved remainder
Record type
claim
Stored status
reported
Evidence grade
sourced

2Authored explanation

The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.

Strongest checked result: Evaluating weight enumerators and finding minimum distance have strong hardness results, while the recent MathOverflow thread gives no reduction or algorithm for equality of the full polynomials.

Exact unresolved remainder: Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, abstract and main hardness results for exact and additive-approximate evaluation of a binary-code weight enumerator

4What was measured

5How it connects

Replaces

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1390",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "binary-code-weight-enumerator-equality-complexity-status-packet-quality-20260801",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Dated status and exact unresolved remainder",
  "summary": "Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: Evaluating weight enumerators and finding minimum distance have strong hardness results, while the recent MathOverflow thread gives no reduction or algorithm for equality of the full polynomials. Exact unresolved remainder: Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance.",
  "relevance": "For Complexity of equality for binary-code weight enumerators, this successor gives readable dated status prose and the exact remaining research boundary.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.\n\nStrongest checked result: Evaluating weight enumerators and finding minimum distance have strong hardness results, while the recent MathOverflow thread gives no reduction or algorithm for equality of the full polynomials.\n\nExact unresolved remainder: Give a deterministic polynomial-time algorithm with proof, or prove hardness under a named standard reduction and place the problem in the strongest justified upper complexity class. A hardness proof must map every input to two explicitly constructible binary generator matrices and prove equality of their entire weight enumerators exactly when the source instance is a yes-instance.",
  "status": "reported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0304044",
      "locator": "abstract and main hardness results for exact and additive-approximate evaluation of a binary-code weight enumerator"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/cs/0304044",
    "locator": "abstract and main hardness results for exact and additive-approximate evaluation of a binary-code weight enumerator"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1285",
      "title": "Current checked status and unresolved remainder",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supersedes",
      "direction": "outgoing",
      "metadata": {
        "reason": "Replaces unreadable status prose with the dated review from 2026-08-01."
      }
    },
    {
      "slug": "binary-code-weight-enumerator-equality-complexity",
      "title": "binary code weight enumerator equality complexity",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.