TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR1550

R1550Sourced evidence

Dated status and exact unresolved remainder

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open. Exact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: reported

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Four exponentials conjecture

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Dated status and exact unresolved remainder
Record type
claim
Stored status
reported
Evidence grade
sourced

2Authored explanation

The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.

Strongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open.

Exact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, section 4, especially the corollaries of Theorem 2 on pages 87-88

4What was measured

5How it connects

Replaces

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1550",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "four-exponentials-conjecture-status-packet-quality-20260801",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Dated status and exact unresolved remainder",
  "summary": "Unresolved in this packet after the dated source check. Strongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open. Exact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.",
  "relevance": "For Four exponentials conjecture, this successor gives readable dated status prose and the exact remaining research boundary.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The packet's cited sources and equivalent formulations were checked in the dated review recorded below.\n\nStrongest checked result: The six exponentials theorem proves the analogous 2 by 3 statement, and Schanuel's conjecture implies the four exponentials target. Waldschmidt's survey chapter records the complex four-exponentials problem as open.\n\nExact unresolved remainder: For every two Q-linearly independent x-values and two Q-linearly independent y-values, prove that at least one of the four exponentials is transcendental, or give qualifying pairs for which all four are algebraic.",
  "status": "reported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-14-1-73-88",
      "locator": "section 4, especially the corollaries of Theorem 2 on pages 87-88"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.4064/aa-14-1-73-88",
    "locator": "section 4, especially the corollaries of Theorem 2 on pages 87-88"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1064",
      "title": "Current status and unresolved remainder",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supersedes",
      "direction": "outgoing",
      "metadata": {
        "reason": "Replaces unreadable status prose with the dated review from 2026-08-01."
      }
    },
    {
      "slug": "four-exponentials-conjecture",
      "title": "four exponentials conjecture",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.