TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR1677

R1677Sourced evidence

Current status and exact unresolved remainder

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked neighboring result: Candidate constructions follow from factoring, lattice, coding, and other assumptions; black-box and structural equivalences connect OWFs to cryptographic primitives. Exact unresolved remainder: No unconditional construction or impossibility theorem is known.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: reported

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Do one-way functions exist?

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Current status and exact unresolved remainder
Record type
claim
Stored status
reported
Evidence grade
sourced

2Authored explanation

The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.

The strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Candidate constructions follow from factoring, lattice, coding, and other assumptions; black-box and structural equivalences connect OWFs to cryptographic primitives.

The exact unresolved remainder is: No unconditional construction or impossibility theorem is known.

A complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions: - Construct such a family and prove security unconditionally. - Or prove every polynomial-time computable function family can be inverted with nonnegligible probability in probabilistic polynomial time.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, R. Impagliazzo and M. Luby, One-way functions are essential for complexity based cryptography, FOCS 1989. main equivalence theorems

4What was measured

5How it connects

Informed by

Evidenced by

Addressed by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1677",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "one-way-functions-exist-claim-status-20260801",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
  "summary": "OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked neighboring result: Candidate constructions follow from factoring, lattice, coding, and other assumptions; black-box and structural equivalences connect OWFs to cryptographic primitives. Exact unresolved remainder: No unconditional construction or impossibility theorem is known.",
  "relevance": "This is the dated publication status for the canonical target Do one-way functions exist?.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.\n\nThe strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Candidate constructions follow from factoring, lattice, coding, and other assumptions; black-box and structural equivalences connect OWFs to cryptographic primitives.\n\nThe exact unresolved remainder is: No unconditional construction or impossibility theorem is known.\n\nA complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions:\n- Construct such a family and prove security unconditionally.\n- Or prove every polynomial-time computable function family can be inverted with nonnegligible probability in probabilistic polynomial time.",
  "status": "reported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1989.63483",
      "locator": "R. Impagliazzo and M. Luby, One-way functions are essential for complexity based cryptography, FOCS 1989. main equivalence theorems"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1109/SFCS.1989.63483",
    "locator": "R. Impagliazzo and M. Luby, One-way functions are essential for complexity based cryptography, FOCS 1989. main equivalence theorems"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1676",
      "title": "Strongest checked neighboring result",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R1674",
      "title": "Dated source and duplicate audit",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R1675",
      "title": "Work at the unresolved boundary",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "addresses",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "one-way-functions-exist",
      "title": "one way functions exist",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.