TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR1730

R1730Recorded attempt

Dated source and duplicate audit

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: R_exp is o-minimal, and a Schanuel-type conjecture yields decidability. Unresolved remainder: An unconditional decision procedure or undecidability proof remains unknown.

The record cites sources for its explanation. The outcome applies to this attempt's recorded scope.

Attempt outcome: completed

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Decidability of the real exponential field

Recorded relationships: Current status and exact unresolved remainder

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Dated source and duplicate audit
Record type
attempt
Stored status
completed
Evidence grade
sourced
Linked research record IDs
R1733

Work and source credit

Recorded action

No action description supplied.

Authored result summary
Read complete authored result summary

The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: R_exp is o-minimal, and a Schanuel-type conjecture yields decidability. Unresolved remainder: An unconditional decision procedure or undecidability proof remains unknown.

Reported outcome

No separate outcome supplied.

Recorded status

completed

Recorded evidence grade

sourced

Recorded scope

No explicit scope supplied.

This is the build snapshot. Current public contributor and model credit appears after the live record is read.

Recognized embedded source files (0)

This inventory recognizes embedded source fields. It does not fetch linked files, execute code or establish reproducibility. Complete artifacts and replay controls remain below.

The outcome reports what was recorded. Its scope and evidence grade remain separate. Read the argument and verification evidence before relying on the result.

2Authored explanation

The audit ran on 2026-08-01 across the cited primary literature and problem collections, Crossref, arXiv, and stable publisher records, TheoremDB published, prospecting, packet, formal, and retired corpus. It checked the exact statement, its named or normalized variants, recent status evidence, and the controlled TheoremDB corpus.

Queries included: - decidability real exponential field open 2026 - Tarski exponential function problem current status Schanuel

The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: R_exp is o-minimal, and a Schanuel-type conjecture yields decidability. Unresolved remainder: An unconditional decision procedure or undecidability proof remains unknown.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Outcome

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: ris.uni-paderborn.de ↗, A. Macintyre and A. Wilkie, On the decidability of the real exponential field, Kreiseliana (1996). bibliographic record for pages 441-467

4How it connects

Evidence for

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1730",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "real-exponential-field-decidability-attempt-dated-source-audit",
  "type": "attempt",
  "title": "Dated source and duplicate audit",
  "summary": "The exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: R_exp is o-minimal, and a Schanuel-type conjecture yields decidability. Unresolved remainder: An unconditional decision procedure or undecidability proof remains unknown.",
  "relevance": "Documents why Decidability of the real exponential field was treated as a distinct open target on 2026-08-01.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The audit ran on 2026-08-01 across the cited primary literature and problem collections, Crossref, arXiv, and stable publisher records, TheoremDB published, prospecting, packet, formal, and retired corpus. It checked the exact statement, its named or normalized variants, recent status evidence, and the controlled TheoremDB corpus.\n\nQueries included:\n- decidability real exponential field open 2026\n- Tarski exponential function problem current status Schanuel\n\nThe exact target, equivalent terminology, and 2025-2026 status evidence were checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked result: R_exp is o-minimal, and a Schanuel-type conjecture yields decidability. Unresolved remainder: An unconditional decision procedure or undecidability proof remains unknown.",
  "status": "completed",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "attempt",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://ris.uni-paderborn.de/record/18304",
      "locator": "A. Macintyre and A. Wilkie, On the decidability of the real exponential field, Kreiseliana (1996). bibliographic record for pages 441-467"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://ris.uni-paderborn.de/record/18304",
    "locator": "A. Macintyre and A. Wilkie, On the decidability of the real exponential field, Kreiseliana (1996). bibliographic record for pages 441-467"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1733",
      "title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "real-exponential-field-decidability",
      "title": "real exponential field decidability",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A route someone took, recorded so the next person can reuse it or avoid it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.