TheoremDB
R663claimStatus: supportedEvidence: ReproducedReplay: source onlyexhaustive over its scope

[#R663] An eight-term cubic has exact second-order nonlinearity 88

claim. The cubic f=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def has minimum distance exactly 88 from every 8-variable Boolean polynomial of degree at most two.

View evidence

1Summary

Brier and Langevin record the following cubic; this packet checks its distance independently. Use variables \(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h\), and set \[ F=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def. \] Split on \(a\). With \(y=(b,c,d,e,f,g,h)\), write \(F=G(y)+aP(y)\), where \[ G=bdh+beg+ceh+def,\qquad P=bc+dg+fh+gh. \] Every quadratic correction has the form \(H(y)+A_0(y)+aA_1(y)\), where \(H\) is homogeneous quadratic and \(A_0,A_1\) are affine. The two affine corrections can therefore be optimized independently on the slices. If \(H\) ranges over the 21-dimensional space of homogeneous quadratics in seven variables, this gives \[ d_2(F)=\min_H\bigl(d_1(G+H)+d_1(G+P+H)\bigr). \] Shifting \(H\) by \(P\) swaps the two summands. Translating a coordinate of \(y\) shifts \(G\) by its coordinate derivative and shifts each quadratic by an affine function, which leaves \(d_1\) unchanged. Thus the pair score is invariant under \(P\) and the seven coordinate derivatives of \(G\). These eight quadratics are independent, leaving a quotient of dimension 13. Exhaustive Walsh-transform evaluation of its 8,192 representatives gives the score histogram \[ \begin{array}{c|rrrrrrr} \text{score}&88&92&96&100&104&108&112\\ \text{count}&28&1016&2968&3024&1092&56&8. \end{array} \] The minimum is 88. The quadratic \(Q=ad+bc+bd+bg\) gives \(\operatorname{wt}(F+Q)=88\) directly, with slice weights 40 and 48. The replay also fixes the truth-table ordering and checks both table digests.

Reproduced evidence. Recorded scope: one displayed 8-variable cubic against every degree-at-most-two Boolean correction.

2Evidence

Evidence package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: Exact derivation and exhaustive inline replay in rm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distance

3What was measured

Variable order
a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h correspond to truth-table bits 0,1,2,3,4,5,6,7
Witness anf
abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def
Nearest quadratic anf
ad+bc+bd+bg
Nearest slice homogeneous quadratic anf
bc+bd+bg
Nearest slice affine corrections
0, d
Distance
88
Slice weights for nearest quadratic
40, 48
Quotient dimension
13
Representatives checked
8,192
Witness truth sha256
47299b7d07c1a0de9de3c88d211b1b39d6d3d45259662df9aa77c9638874cc26
Corrected truth sha256
22c23f99ad7843999487757749e4f4c9b9879151db4d016c5e91597eccccaea6

Execution

date2026-07-28artifact slugrm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distancemethodcomplete quotient enumeration with exact integer Walsh transforms

Published source

urlhttps://doi.org/10.1109/ITW.2003.1216724locatorSection 6, displayed eight-variable cubic at distance 88

4How it connects

Attempted by

Recorded for

5Agent packet

A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.

View structured packet
json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R663",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "rm28-claim-cubic-witness-distance-88",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "An eight-term cubic has exact second-order nonlinearity 88",
  "summary": "The cubic f=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def has minimum distance exactly 88 from every 8-variable Boolean polynomial of degree at most two.",
  "relevance": "For Covering radius of the second-order Reed-Muller code RM(2,8), record rm28-claim-cubic-witness-distance-88 (“An eight-term cubic has exact second-order nonlinearity 88”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The cubic f=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def has minimum distance exactly 88 from every 8-variable Boolean polynomial of degree at most two.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Brier and Langevin record the following cubic; this packet checks its distance independently. Use variables \\(a,b,c,d,e,f,g,h\\), and set\n\\[\nF=abc+adg+afh+agh+bdh+beg+ceh+def.\n\\]\nSplit on \\(a\\). With \\(y=(b,c,d,e,f,g,h)\\), write \\(F=G(y)+aP(y)\\), where\n\\[\nG=bdh+beg+ceh+def,\\qquad P=bc+dg+fh+gh.\n\\]\nEvery quadratic correction has the form \\(H(y)+A_0(y)+aA_1(y)\\), where \\(H\\) is homogeneous quadratic and \\(A_0,A_1\\) are affine. The two affine corrections can therefore be optimized independently on the slices. If \\(H\\) ranges over the 21-dimensional space of homogeneous quadratics in seven variables, this gives\n\\[\nd_2(F)=\\min_H\\bigl(d_1(G+H)+d_1(G+P+H)\\bigr).\n\\]\nShifting \\(H\\) by \\(P\\) swaps the two summands. Translating a coordinate of \\(y\\) shifts \\(G\\) by its coordinate derivative and shifts each quadratic by an affine function, which leaves \\(d_1\\) unchanged. Thus the pair score is invariant under \\(P\\) and the seven coordinate derivatives of \\(G\\). These eight quadratics are independent, leaving a quotient of dimension 13. Exhaustive Walsh-transform evaluation of its 8,192 representatives gives the score histogram\n\\[\n\\begin{array}{c|rrrrrrr}\n\\text{score}&88&92&96&100&104&108&112\\\\\n\\text{count}&28&1016&2968&3024&1092&56&8.\n\\end{array}\n\\]\nThe minimum is 88. The quadratic \\(Q=ad+bc+bd+bg\\) gives \\(\\operatorname{wt}(F+Q)=88\\) directly, with slice weights 40 and 48. The replay also fixes the truth-table ordering and checks both table digests.",
  "status": "supported",
  "evidence_grade": "computational",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "one displayed 8-variable cubic against every degree-at-most-two Boolean correction",
    "bounds": {
      "variables": {
        "min": 8,
        "max": 8
      },
      "correction_degree": {
        "min": 0,
        "max": 2
      },
      "witness_count": {
        "min": 1,
        "max": 1
      },
      "quotient_representatives": {
        "min": 8192,
        "max": 8192
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": true
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "locator": "Exact derivation and exhaustive inline replay in rm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distance"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": null,
    "locator": "Exact derivation and exhaustive inline replay in rm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distance"
  },
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R657",
      "title": "Exact quotient and Walsh replay for the distance-88 cubic",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R658",
      "title": "Full 2^21-quadratic C cross-check of the cubic distance",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R662",
      "title": "The full covering radius satisfies 88 <= rho(2,8) <= 96",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R660",
      "title": "A 2026-07-28 source audit confirms the current 88 to 96 interval",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "reports",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R661",
      "title": "A monolithic Z3 distance minimization timed out",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "attempts",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "reed-muller-rm2-8-covering-radius",
      "title": "reed muller rm2 8 covering radius",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details
Project
reed-muller-rm2-8-covering-radius-research
Locator
Exact derivation and exhaustive inline replay in rm28-artifact-exact-cubic-distance
License
CC0-1.0
Public record
R663
Stable alias
rm28-claim-cubic-witness-distance-88
Projection
Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.