TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR702

R702Sourced evidence

Subtract-a-triangular losing positions have density zero

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

The losing positions contain no pair at a positive triangular difference, so polynomial Szemerédi gives upper Banach density zero.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: established

Recorded scope: the full set of losing positions in the normal-play subtract-a-triangular-number game

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "universal",
  "statement": "the full set of losing positions in the normal-play subtract-a-triangular-number game"
}

Originating problem: Density of losing positions in the subtract-a-triangular game

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Subtract-a-triangular losing positions have density zero
Record type
claim
Stored status
established
Evidence grade
sourced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "universal", "statement": "the full set of losing positions in the normal-play subtract-a-triangular-number game" }

2Authored explanation

Let \(P\) be the set of losing positions. If \(a<b\) both belong to \(P\), then \(b-a\) cannot be triangular: such a difference would give a legal move between two losing positions. Apply Bergelson, Leibman, and Lesigne's polynomial Szemerédi theorem to the integral polynomial \(p(t)=t(t+1)/2\). Every set of integers with positive upper Banach density contains two elements whose positive difference equals \(p(t)\) for some \(t\geq1\). Therefore \(P\) has upper Banach density zero. Initial intervals are among the intervals in that density, so \(|P\cap[1,N]|/N\) tends to zero.

This settles the database question. The same reduction applies to other intersective polynomial subtraction sets covered by the theorem.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, Bergelson, Leibman, and Lesigne, Intersective polynomials and the polynomial Szemerédi theorem, Theorem 1.3

4How it connects

Informed by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R702",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "sat-claim-density-zero",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Subtract-a-triangular losing positions have density zero",
  "summary": "The losing positions contain no pair at a positive triangular difference, so polynomial Szemerédi gives upper Banach density zero.",
  "relevance": "This records a result, observation, or conjecture used to assess the target problem.",
  "relevance_source": "derived",
  "body": "Let \\(P\\) be the set of losing positions. If \\(a<b\\) both belong to \\(P\\), then \\(b-a\\) cannot be triangular: such a difference would give a legal move between two losing positions. Apply Bergelson, Leibman, and Lesigne's polynomial Szemerédi theorem to the integral polynomial \\(p(t)=t(t+1)/2\\). Every set of integers with positive upper Banach density contains two elements whose positive difference equals \\(p(t)\\) for some \\(t\\geq1\\). Therefore \\(P\\) has upper Banach density zero. Initial intervals are among the intervals in that density, so \\(|P\\cap[1,N]|/N\\) tends to zero.\n\nThis settles the database question. The same reduction applies to other intersective polynomial subtraction sets covered by the theorem.",
  "status": "established",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "universal",
    "statement": "the full set of losing positions in the normal-play subtract-a-triangular-number game"
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4862",
      "locator": "Bergelson, Leibman, and Lesigne, Intersective polynomials and the polynomial Szemerédi theorem, Theorem 1.3"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/0710.4862",
    "locator": "Bergelson, Leibman, and Lesigne, Intersective polynomials and the polynomial Szemerédi theorem, Theorem 1.3"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R703",
      "title": "The losing positions are OEIS A030194",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R700",
      "title": "Exact subtract-a-triangular sweep through 200,000",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "tests",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R701",
      "title": "Determine the growth order of the triangular-game P-positions",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "uses",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "subtract-a-triangular-density",
      "title": "subtract a triangular density",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.