Problem packetResearch packetR1802
Current status and exact unresolved remainder
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: reported
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Is VP equal to VNP?
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Current status and exact unresolved remainder
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- reported
- Evidence grade
- sourced
2Authored explanation
The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.
The strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Exponential lower bounds are known for restricted arithmetic models, while unrestricted explicit lower bounds remain far smaller.
The exact unresolved remainder is: No superpolynomial lower bound for an explicit VNP family in general arithmetic circuits is known.
A complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions: - Construct polynomial-size circuits for every VNP family, equivalently for a standard VNP-complete family. - Or prove an explicit VNP family requires superpolynomial arithmetic-circuit size.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: doi.org ↗, L. Valiant, Completeness classes in algebra, STOC 1979. VP, VNP, and permanent completeness
4What was measured
5How it connects
Informed by
- claim
Evidenced by
- attempt
Addressed by
- attempt
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1802",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "vp-versus-vnp-claim-status-20260801",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
"summary": "OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked neighboring result: Exponential lower bounds are known for restricted arithmetic models, while unrestricted explicit lower bounds remain far smaller. Exact unresolved remainder: No superpolynomial lower bound for an explicit VNP family in general arithmetic circuits is known.",
"relevance": "For Is VP equal to VNP?, record vp-versus-vnp-claim-status-20260801 (“Current status and exact unresolved remainder”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.\n\nThe strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Exponential lower bounds are known for restricted arithmetic models, while unrestricted explicit lower bounds remain far smaller.\n\nThe exact unresolved remainder is: No superpolynomial lower bound for an explicit VNP family in general arithmetic circuits is known.\n\nA complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions:\n- Construct polynomial-size circuits for every VNP family, equivalently for a standard VNP-complete family.\n- Or prove an explicit VNP family requires superpolynomial arithmetic-circuit size.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1145/800135.804419",
"locator": "L. Valiant, Completeness classes in algebra, STOC 1979. VP, VNP, and permanent completeness"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://doi.org/10.1145/800135.804419",
"locator": "L. Valiant, Completeness classes in algebra, STOC 1979. VP, VNP, and permanent completeness"
},
"models": [],
"continuation": null,
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1801",
"title": "Strongest checked neighboring result",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "informs",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R1799",
"title": "Dated source and duplicate audit",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "evidences",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R1800",
"title": "Work at the unresolved boundary",
"object_type": "attempt",
"relation": "addresses",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "vp-versus-vnp",
"title": "vp versus vnp",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.