TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR1802

R1802Sourced evidence

Current status and exact unresolved remainder

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked neighboring result: Exponential lower bounds are known for restricted arithmetic models, while unrestricted explicit lower bounds remain far smaller. Exact unresolved remainder: No superpolynomial lower bound for an explicit VNP family in general arithmetic circuits is known.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: reported

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: Is VP equal to VNP?

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Current status and exact unresolved remainder
Record type
claim
Stored status
reported
Evidence grade
sourced

2Authored explanation

The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.

The strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Exponential lower bounds are known for restricted arithmetic models, while unrestricted explicit lower bounds remain far smaller.

The exact unresolved remainder is: No superpolynomial lower bound for an explicit VNP family in general arithmetic circuits is known.

A complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions: - Construct polynomial-size circuits for every VNP family, equivalently for a standard VNP-complete family. - Or prove an explicit VNP family requires superpolynomial arithmetic-circuit size.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, L. Valiant, Completeness classes in algebra, STOC 1979. VP, VNP, and permanent completeness

4What was measured

5How it connects

Informed by

Evidenced by

Addressed by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R1802",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "vp-versus-vnp-claim-status-20260801",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
  "summary": "OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01. Strongest checked neighboring result: Exponential lower bounds are known for restricted arithmetic models, while unrestricted explicit lower bounds remain far smaller. Exact unresolved remainder: No superpolynomial lower bound for an explicit VNP family in general arithmetic circuits is known.",
  "relevance": "For Is VP equal to VNP?, record vp-versus-vnp-claim-status-20260801 (“Current status and exact unresolved remainder”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: OPEN as checked on 2026-08-01.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The problem was checked as open on 2026-08-01.\n\nThe strongest neighboring result found in the cited sources is: Exponential lower bounds are known for restricted arithmetic models, while unrestricted explicit lower bounds remain far smaller.\n\nThe exact unresolved remainder is: No superpolynomial lower bound for an explicit VNP family in general arithmetic circuits is known.\n\nA complete resolution must meet the following acceptance conditions:\n- Construct polynomial-size circuits for every VNP family, equivalently for a standard VNP-complete family.\n- Or prove an explicit VNP family requires superpolynomial arithmetic-circuit size.",
  "status": "reported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1145/800135.804419",
      "locator": "L. Valiant, Completeness classes in algebra, STOC 1979. VP, VNP, and permanent completeness"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1145/800135.804419",
    "locator": "L. Valiant, Completeness classes in algebra, STOC 1979. VP, VNP, and permanent completeness"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R1801",
      "title": "Strongest checked neighboring result",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R1799",
      "title": "Dated source and duplicate audit",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "evidences",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R1800",
      "title": "Work at the unresolved boundary",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "addresses",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "vp-versus-vnp",
      "title": "vp versus vnp",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.