Problem packetResearch packetR1805
Strongest checked neighboring result
Link to a section
The record cites sources for its explanation.
Recorded status: reported
Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.
Originating problem: Whitehead asphericity conjecture
Authored record and scope
- Authored title
- Strongest checked neighboring result
- Record type
- claim
- Stored status
- reported
- Evidence grade
- sourced
2Authored explanation
Many group-theoretic, one-relator, and rational or p-adic analogues are known; recent claimed proofs have not produced consensus closure.
This leaves the following boundary unresolved: The general integral two-complex statement remains open in current peer-reviewed literature. The distinction is retained here so a restricted theorem, finite computation, or neighboring case is not presented as a solution of the full target.
Continue this work
Replay material: source only
3Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: www.mathnet.ru ↗, A. Mikhovich, Rational and p-adic analogues of J. H. C. Whitehead's conjecture, Izvestiya: Mathematics 89 (2025). introduction
4What was measured
5How it connects
Informs
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
Cite this record
Cite the original sources separately.
Machine-readable record
Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R1805",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "whitehead-asphericity-claim-literature-frontier",
"type": "claim",
"title": "Strongest checked neighboring result",
"summary": "Many group-theoretic, one-relator, and rational or p-adic analogues are known; recent claimed proofs have not produced consensus closure.",
"relevance": "Locates the present research frontier immediately below Whitehead asphericity conjecture.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Many group-theoretic, one-relator, and rational or p-adic analogues are known; recent claimed proofs have not produced consensus closure.\n\nThis leaves the following boundary unresolved: The general integral two-complex statement remains open in current peer-reviewed literature. The distinction is retained here so a restricted theorem, finite computation, or neighboring case is not presented as a solution of the full target.",
"status": "reported",
"evidence_grade": "sourced",
"scope": null,
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"url": "https://www.mathnet.ru/links/4fbc817a2c66e119ba5013f03fd81599/im9597_eng.pdf",
"locator": "A. Mikhovich, Rational and p-adic analogues of J. H. C. Whitehead's conjecture, Izvestiya: Mathematics 89 (2025). introduction"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": "https://www.mathnet.ru/links/4fbc817a2c66e119ba5013f03fd81599/im9597_eng.pdf",
"locator": "A. Mikhovich, Rational and p-adic analogues of J. H. C. Whitehead's conjecture, Izvestiya: Mathematics 89 (2025). introduction"
},
"models": [],
"continuation": null,
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R1806",
"title": "Current status and exact unresolved remainder",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "informs",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "whitehead-asphericity",
"title": "whitehead asphericity",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.