TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2700] Exact heat-bath spectral gap on the six by six Ising torus

Work on this problem in ChatGPT
A neutral vertex and edge schematic for Exact heat-bath spectral gap on the six by six Ising torus.A code-rendered placeholder showing only the mathematical setup.
A neutral schematic of the objects and relations in the statement.

Problem. For the ferromagnetic Ising model on \(C_6\mathbin{\square}C_6\) at inverse temperature \(\beta=(\log2)/2\) and zero field, choose one vertex uniformly and resample its spin from the conditional Gibbs law. Determine the exact spectral gap of this \(2^{36}\)-state Markov chain.

1Context

The raw matrix has 68719476736 states. Exact symmetry reduction and transfer methods are needed beyond direct storage.

2Remarks

Remark 1. The Hamiltonian is minus the sum of sigma_u sigma_v over the 72 torus edges.

Remark 2. The spectral gap is 1-lambda_2, where lambda_2 is the second-largest eigenvalue of the reversible transition operator.

3What counts as a solution

  • Give the gap as an exact algebraic value or a rational isolating interval, with a symmetry-block characteristic or verified eigenvalue certificate covering every sector.

1Status

Current status (A certified rational interval for the six-torus heat-bath gap). The gap is at least 1/170005193383307227693056 and at most 48265367094829605687889/36363194510128970638045284, approximately 0.00132731372325897517.[1]

1Records

3 records

Notes and companion materialContext, examples, and computations

Original intake status. UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-25. The gap is at least 1/170005193383307227693056 and at most 48265367094829605687889/36363194510128970638045284, approximately 0.00132731372325897517. The checked sources do not settle the full acceptance condition.

  • The dated packet audit checked the exact title, parameter, and the terminology used by the cited primary literature.
  • The strongest recorded neighboring result is: The gap is at least 1/170005193383307227693056 and at most 48265367094829605687889/36363194510128970638045284, approximately 0.00132731372325897517.
  • The controlled TheoremDB corpus was checked for equivalent formulations and contains no duplicate published target.

Recorded example 1. The same convention on the 3 by 3 and 4 by 4 tori gives approximate gaps 0.0081675847 and 0.0035257034.

Computational notes

  • Implicit reversible power iteration over all states reproduced gaps 0.008167584663204663 for side 3 and 0.003525703353460252 for side 4. Direct enumeration also verified that every heat-bath probability is one of the five stated rationals.
How the 3 records connectTyped relations and evidence flow
How the records connect to the problem

ProblemExact heat-bath spectral gap on the six by six Ising torus

2See also

How to cite

TheoremDB contributors, “Exact heat-bath spectral gap on the six by six Ising torus,” TheoremDB research memory, snapshot of July 25, 2026. https://theoremdb.org/statements/ising-six-torus-heat-bath-gap

This problem includes 3 records joined by 2 typed links, sourced from doi.org[1], current as of July 25, 2026.

1References

  1. Packet source. Eyal Lubetzky and Allan Sly, “Cutoff for the Ising model on the lattice”. Inventiones mathematicae 191(3) (2013), 719-755. DOI 10.1007/s00222-012-0404-5. Richard Holley and Daniel Stroock, Logarithmic Sobolev Inequalities and Stochastic Ising Models, Journal of Statistical Physics 46 (1987), 1159-1194, DOI 10.1007/BF01011161; Fabio Martinelli, Lectures on Glauber Dynamics for Discrete Spin Models, Lecture Notes in Mathematics 1717 (1999), 93-191, DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-48115-7_2; Eyal Lubetzky and Allan Sly, Cutoff for the Ising Model on the Lattice, Inventiones Mathematicae 191 (2013), 719-755, DOI 10.1007/s00222-012-0404-5. journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.Literature gives the general framework, while the exact 6 by 6 value remains unlocated. The checked sources cover spectral-gap comparison and high-temperature torus dynamics. The audit found no published characteristic polynomial or exact gap for this parameter choice.Also cited at Exact transfer certificate in ising6-artifact-row-transfer-rayleigh and comparison proof in this record.Also cited at Inline Python 3 exact computation executed on 2026-07-25.For Exact heat-bath spectral gap on the six by six Ising torus: The checked sources cover spectral-gap comparison and high-temperature torus dynamics. The audit found no published characteristic polynomial or exact gap for this parameter choice.Source named by the research packet.

Original CC0 exact finite-volume Glauber-dynamics target.

Flag this problem

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.