TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2730] Sharp fourth-power norm of the cyclic Hilbert transform at order 31

Work on this problem in ChatGPT
A mathematical schematic of Sharp fourth-power norm of the cyclic Hilbert transform at order 31.
A statement-only illustration of the mathematical objects and operations in this problem.

Problem. On real zero-mean functions \(f:C_{31}\to\mathbb R\), define \(H\) by the Fourier multiplier \(\widehat{Hf}(k)=-i\operatorname{sgn}(k)\widehat f(k)\) for representatives \(-15\leq k\leq15\). Determine the sharp value of \(\|Hf\|_4/\|f\|_4\).

1Context

This finite-dimensional operator-norm problem asks for the exact sharp \(L^4\) amplification of a fixed Fourier multiplier on the zero-mean real subspace.

2Conventions

Convention 1. Any consistent Fourier-transform normalization may be used because the quotient is unchanged.

Convention 2. The zero Fourier mode is sent to zero.

3What counts as a solution

  • Give an exact value or exact mathematical characterization of the sharp constant, characterize the extremizers modulo scaling and cyclic symmetries, and prove a matching global upper bound. A numerical enclosure alone is partial computational evidence.

1Status

Current status (The sharp fourth-power norm lies between 1.5693 and 1.6453). A rational zero-mean witness gives the lower endpoint, while the exact Fourier multiplier and the convolution row norm give the upper endpoint.

1Records

4 records

Notes and companion materialContext, examples, and computations

Original intake status. OPEN in the reviewed TheoremDB packet as of 2026-08-01. A rational zero-mean witness gives the lower endpoint, while the exact Fourier multiplier and the convolution row norm give the upper endpoint.

  • The maximization is homogeneous but nonconvex; stationary points require a global certificate rather than a local Hessian check.
  • Real-valuedness couples positive and negative Fourier modes.
  • Riesz-Thorin interpolation between the exact l2 norm one and the row l1 norm gives a useful rigorous upper bound.
  • Fresh exact-title, parameter, source, and corpus searches were completed on 2026-08-01.

Recorded example 1. A centered point mass gives ratio approximately 0.78436.

Computational notes

  • One hundred seeded projected-gradient starts found ratio 1.5693754353475171. The convolution row has l1 norm 2.7067603201066213, while the l2 operator norm is one, so interpolation gives the rigorous upper bound sqrt(2.7067603201066213), approximately 1.64522.
How the 4 records connectTyped relations and evidence flow
How the records connect to the problem

ProblemSharp fourth-power norm of the cyclic Hilbert transform at order 31

2See also

How to cite

TheoremDB contributors, “Sharp fourth-power norm of the cyclic Hilbert transform at order 31,” TheoremDB research memory, snapshot of July 25, 2026. https://theoremdb.org/statements/cyclic-hilbert-l4-norm-31

This problem includes 4 records joined by 3 typed links, current as of July 25, 2026.

1References

  1. Rodrigo Bañuelos and Mateusz Kwaśnicki, “On the ℓp-norm of the discrete Hilbert transform,” Duke Mathematical Journal 168 (2019), no. 3, 471–504. Main theorem and the definition of the discrete Hilbert transform on ℤ. journal article · secondary source · checked 2026-07-28Source use: original summary.Gives the sharp infinite-lattice ℓp norm result nearest to this finite cyclic multiplier problem. It does not determine the order-31 constant.For Sharp fourth-power norm of the cyclic Hilbert transform at order 31: Gives the sharp infinite-lattice ℓp norm result nearest to this finite cyclic multiplier problem. It does not determine the order-31 constant.

Original CC0 finite sharp-constant problem.

Flag this problem

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.