TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2662] Most irreducible constant slices of a sparse quintic over F_101

Work on this problem in ChatGPT
A mathematical schematic of Most irreducible constant slices of a sparse quintic over F_101.
A statement-only illustration of the mathematical objects and operations in this problem.

Problem. For nonzero \(a,b\in\mathbb F_{101}\), let \(N(a,b)\) be the number of \(c\in\mathbb F_{101}\) for which \(x^5+a x^2+b x+c\) is irreducible over \(\mathbb F_{101}\). Determine \(\max_{a,b\ne0}N(a,b)\).

1Context

A slice is a natural independent work unit, and every positive test has a short finite-field certificate.

2Problem setup

Definition 1. Irreducible means having no factor of positive degree below five over F_101.

Remark 1. Each pair (a,b) defines a slice of 101 polynomials indexed by c.

3What counts as a solution

  • Give coefficients attaining the maximum and an exact sweep or theorem certifying every one of the 10000 slices.

1The answerReproducednot Lean-verified

Answer (The exact maximum slice count is 29). A complete sweep finds 29 irreducible quintics in each maximizing slice and certifies that every other slice has at most 28.[3]

Verification

The answer is \[ \max_{a,b\in\mathbb F_{101}^{*}}N(a,b)=29. \] Exactly 100 ordered pairs attain the maximum. They have the compact description \[ a^4b^{-3}=62, \] or equivalently \(a^4=62b^3\), in \(\mathbb F_{101}\). The pair \((a,b)=(1,32)\) is one representative. Its 29 successful constants are \[ \{2,3,7,8,11,12,13,15,16,19,26,29,30,33,38,39,41,43,61,65,72,74,79,83,88,89,96,98,99\}. \] The candidate pair \((95,57)\) belongs to the same maximizing class and has the same displayed constant set.

The characterization follows from an exact sweep together with scaling. For \(u\ne0\), substitution and normalization give \[ u^{-5}f_{a,b,c}(ux)=f_{a u^{-3},b u^{-4},c u^{-5}}(x). \] This preserves irreducibility and leaves \(a^4b^{-3}\) unchanged. The action on nonzero coefficient pairs is free because \(u^3=u^4=1\) forces \(u=1\). Its 100-element orbits are exactly the fibers of \(a^4b^{-3}\). The exhaustive table has one maximizing orbit, with invariant 62.

Across all 10,000 slices, the slice-count histogram is \[ 13{:}200,14{:}400,15{:}300,16{:}700,17{:}600,18{:}1100,19{:}700,20{:}1100,21{:}900,22{:}1100,23{:}600,24{:}900,25{:}600,26{:}400,27{:}200,28{:}100,29{:}100. \] The counts sum to 10,000 slices. Those slices contain 204,200 irreducible polynomials in total.

1Records

3 records

Notes and companion materialContext, examples, and computations

Original intake status. SOLVED in the independently reviewed TheoremDB packet as of 2026-08-01. A complete sweep finds 29 irreducible quintics in each maximizing slice and certifies that every other slice has at most 28.

  • Independent isolated execution completed successfully for Complete Rabin sweep with a second exact criterion. Every embedded assertion passed and the run reproduced the selected exact result: A complete sweep finds 29 irreducible quintics in each maximizing slice and certifies that every other slice has at most 28.
  • Fresh exact-title, parameter, primary-source, and controlled-corpus searches were completed on 2026-08-01.

Recorded example 1. For (a,b)=(95,57), the 29 successful constants are [2,3,7,8,11,12,13,15,16,19,26,29,30,33,38,39,41,43,61,65,72,74,79,83,88,89,96,98,99].

Computational notes

  • Exact Rabin tests verified all 29 displayed quintics, giving a lower bound of 29. For fixed a,b, the map x->x^5+a*x^2+b*x has image size at least ceil(101/5)=21. Every c producing an irreducible quintic must avoid the negative of this image, so N(a,b)<=80.
How the 3 records connectTyped relations and evidence flow
How the records connect to the problem

ProblemMost irreducible constant slices of a sparse quintic over F_101

2See also

How to cite

TheoremDB contributors, “Most irreducible constant slices of a sparse quintic over F_101,” TheoremDB research memory, snapshot of July 25, 2026. https://theoremdb.org/statements/irreducible-quintic-f101-slices

This problem includes 3 records joined by 2 typed links, sourced from doi.org[3], current as of July 25, 2026.

1Lean verification

Lean formalization needed

An informal proof is recorded. A Lean formalization still needs to be attached. TheoremDB Researcher can start from the exact statement and pinned world.

Open TheoremDB Researcher

The prefilled request prepares the target and checks drafts. It submits the accepted proof and polls verification through any packet-review handoff.

1References

  1. Robert Granger, On the Enumeration of Irreducible Polynomials over GF(q) with Prescribed Coefficients, Finite Fields and Their Applications 57 (2019), 156-229; Michael O. Rabin, SIAM Journal on Computing 9 (1980), 273-280; Zhicheng Gao, Simon Kuttner, and Qiang Wang, Finite Fields and Their Applications 80 (2022), 102023. journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-08-01Source use: original summary.This source fixes the published convention, theorem, formula, or independent answer used to check the packet resolution.For Most irreducible constant slices of a sparse quintic over F_101, the reviewed source scope is Robert Granger, On the Enumeration of Irreducible Polynomials over GF(q) with Prescribed Coefficients, Finite Fields and Their Applications 57 (2019), 156-229; Michael O. Rabin, SIAM Journal on Computing 9 (1980), 273-280; Zhicheng Gao, Simon Kuttner, and Qiang Wang, Finite Fields and Their Applications 80 (2022), 102023. The packet makes no inference beyond that cited scope.
  2. Zhicheng Gao, Simon Kuttner, and Qiang Wang, “Counting irreducible polynomials with prescribed coefficients over a finite field”. Finite Fields and Their Applications 80 (2022), 102023. DOI 10.1016/j.ffa.2022.102023. Full journal article relevant to Most irreducible constant slices of a sparse quintic over F_101. scholarly publication · reference source · version of record · checked 2026-08-01Source use: citation only.For Most irreducible constant slices of a sparse quintic over F_101: Provides a source or neighboring result used in the packet for “irreducible quintic f101 slices.”
  3. Packet source. Michael O. Rabin, Probabilistic Algorithms in Finite Fields, SIAM Journal on Computing 9 (1980), 273-280; exact executable sweep run on 2026-07-25. Complete exact sweep in iqf101-artifact-rabin-sweep. scholarly publication · reference source · version of record · checked 2026-08-01Source use: citation only.Provides Rabin's finite-field irreducibility test used to cross-check the packet's complete computation over F_101.Also cited at Michael O. Rabin, Probabilistic Algorithms in Finite Fields, SIAM Journal on Computing 9 (1980), 273-280; exact executable sweep run on 2026-07-25.

CC0 optimization over sparse polynomial slices.

Flag this problem

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.