TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2538] Eventual monotonicity in a signed subset-sum local limit

Work on this problem in ChatGPT
A neutral state and word schematic for Eventual monotonicity in a signed subset-sum local limit.A code-rendered placeholder showing only the mathematical setup.q₀q₁q₂0101101
A neutral schematic of the objects and relations in the statement.

Problem. Let independent signs \(\varepsilon_k\) take values \(\pm1\) equally likely, set \(S_n=\sum_{k=1}^n k\varepsilon_k\), and \(\sigma_n^2=\sum_{k=1}^n k^2\). Among n with \(n(n+1)/2\) even, is the sequence \(\sigma_n\Pr(S_n=0)\) strictly increasing once \(n\ge16\)?

1Remarks

Remark 1. The parity condition is necessary and sufficient for zero to lie on the support lattice.

Remark 2. The admissible n are those congruent to 0 or 3 modulo 4, ordered in the usual way.

2What counts as a solution

  • Prove every consecutive admissible comparison is strict after n=16, or exhibit an admissible counterexample.

1Status

Current status (The all-n monotonicity claim remains unresolved in this audit). Exact computation proves the claim through n=1000; the located asymptotic theorem gives convergence without a termwise inequality or an effective threshold.[1][3][2]

1Packet records

5 records

Notes and companion materialContext, examples, and computations

Exact coefficient tables make any proposed threshold checkable. Analytic work should record a remainder bound strong enough to dominate the next-term difference.

Original intake status. Status not established. No literature search was performed. Local central limit expansions for weighted Bernoulli sums may decide it.

  • The attractive route is a local central limit expansion whose leading term tends to \(\sqrt{2/\pi}\).
  • The obstruction is the interleaving of the two parity subsequences and the sign of the lattice correction. The normalized sequence decreases at several small transitions, so a leading asymptotic term is insufficient.

Recorded example 1. At n=16 the normalized value is approximately 0.775498980775.

Computational notes

  • Arbitrary-precision integer subset-sum dynamic programming checked every admissible n through 500. The only decreases in the combined admissible sequence occurred at 3 to 4, 8 to 11, and 15 to 16. Values at n=100, 200, and 500 were approximately 0.794303753371, 0.796091731844, and 0.797166849838. The exact zero-sum count at n=200 was 780463610226751719065842218999070243255558586796769387244.
How the 5 records connectTyped relations and evidence flow
How the records connect to the problem

ProblemEventual monotonicity in a signed subset-sum local limit

2See also

How to cite

TheoremDB contributors, “Eventual monotonicity in a signed subset-sum local limit,” TheoremDB research memory, snapshot of July 24, 2026. https://theoremdb.org/statements/signed-subset-sum-local-clt-monotone

This problem includes 5 records joined by 5 typed links, sourced from cs.uwaterloo.ca[1], current as of July 24, 2026.

1References

  1. Packet source. Blair D. Sullivan, On a Conjecture of Andrica and Tomescu, Journal of Integer Sequences 16 (2013), Article 13.3.1. Theorem 4 and its proof. open copy ↗journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-24Source use: citation only.Proves the first-order asymptotic for the zero-sum sign count, without an effective adjacent-monotonicity threshold.Also cited at Sullivan 2013, Theorem 4: first-order asymptotic for the central coefficient.Also cited at Independent exact computation in ssclt-artifact-bitpacked-dp, executed 2026-07-24.Also cited at Inline CPython standard-library computation executed on 2026-07-24.Source named by the research packet.
  2. OEIS Foundation Inc., A063865, number of solutions to ±1 ±2 ... ± n = 0 (checked 27 July 2026). Definition, coefficient formula, references, and term table. reference database · reference source · web version checked 2026-08-01 · checked 2026-07-24Source use: citation only.Records the exact zero-sum sign counts and cross-references the two analytic papers used in the audit.Also cited at A063865, zero-sum sign counts, coefficient formula, references, and term table; accessed 2026-07-24.
  3. Dorin Andrica and Ioan Tomescu, On an Integer Sequence Related to a Product of Trigonometric Functions, and Its Combinatorial Relevance, Journal of Integer Sequences 5 (2002), Article 02.2.4. Abstract, coefficient identity, and main conjecture. journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-24Source use: citation only.Gives the central-coefficient identity, the four-step growth bound, and the original asymptotic conjecture.

Original finite-to-asymptotic monotonicity target for weighted Rademacher sums.

Flag this problem

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.