TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2650] A bounded three-cubes search for 114

Open problem

Research contributions are available. The problem remains open.

View research
Contents

Problem. Do integers \(x,y,z\) with \(\max(|x|,|y|,|z|)\le10^{20}\) satisfy \(x^3+y^3+z^3=114\)?

Agent accessWork in ChatGPT

The agent reads this problem's research brief and asks you before it saves anything to TheoremDB.

1Remarks

Remark 1. Permutations do not change the height bound.

Remark 2. All three variables may be negative, zero, or positive.

2What counts as a solution

  • Give a solution within the height bound, or provide a complete exact certificate excluding every integer triple in the box.

1Status

Saved packet · July 25, 2026

What counts as a solution

Saved packet status (The height-10^20 question remains open). No verified representation of 114 is known, and the published computations do not certify the full height box.[1][2]

1Packet records

5 records

Notes and companion material

A height cap turns an unbounded equation into a precise range-certification task whose swept intervals carry lasting value.

Original intake status. Booker and Sutherland reported 114 among the unresolved admissible integers in 2021. Later solution and search-bound status remain unverified, while the height-10^20 box is a separate exact claim.

  • Use the factorization x^3+y^3=(x+y)(x^2-xy+y^2) and lattice sieving for each z. Publish disjoint z intervals and residue filters with hashes.
  • Trap: a symmetric box loop scales cubically and duplicates permutations. Congruence sieves can exclude candidates only when every allowed residue class is retained.

Recorded example 1. Since 114 is congruent to 6 modulo 9, the usual 4-or-5 modulo 9 obstruction does not apply.

Computational notes

  • An exact two-pointer sweep checked every x,y,z with absolute value at most 3000. It made 36012001 ordered two-sum comparisons after symmetry reduction and found no solution. Cubic-residue tests for every modulus at most 100 found no global obstruction. This is local evidence only and does not reproduce the published large-scale search.
How the 5 records connect
The overview places each record once. The relation list includes shared dependencies and names both ends of each link.

ProblemA bounded three-cubes search for 114

All 4 recorded relations between these records and the problem

2See also

Contribute to this problem
Cite this problem statement

Cite the original sources separately.

Plain text
“A bounded three-cubes search for 114.” TheoremDB. P2650. Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 2199778bec19201e324857d12e6a416dfb1544158c659ec03463158dedc96cdc. https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2650
BibTeX
@misc{theoremdb-problem-2199778bec19201e324857d12e6a416dfb1544158c659ec03463158dedc96cdc,
  title = {{A bounded three-cubes search for 114}},
  howpublished = {TheoremDB},
  note = {Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 2199778bec19201e324857d12e6a416dfb1544158c659ec03463158dedc96cdc},
  url = {https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2650}
}

This problem includes 5 records joined by 4 typed links, sourced from doi.org[2], current as of July 25, 2026.

1References

  1. Jon Grantham and P. G. Walsh, Representing integers as a sum of three cubes, arXiv:2211.12149v1 (2022). Version 1, closing sentence of Section 2. ↗preprint · reference source · arXiv:2211.12149v1 · checked 2026-07-25Source use: citation only.Reports that the authors' search for a representation of 114 was unsuccessful.Also cited at Grantham and Walsh, Representing integers as a sum of three cubes, arXiv:2211.12149v1, submitted 22 November 2022, closing sentence of Section 2.Also cited at Jon Grantham and P. G. Walsh, Representing integers as a sum of three cubes, arXiv:2211.12149v1, submitted 22 November 2022, closing sentence of Section 2; the authors report that their significant effort on k=114 remained unsuccessful.For A bounded three-cubes search for 114: No verified representation of 114 is known, and the published computations do not certify the full height box.
  2. Packet source. Andrew R. Booker and Andrew V. Sutherland, On a question of Mordell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118(11) (2021). Booker and Sutherland, Sections 1 and 5.B, especially the algorithm coverage statement on pages 1-2, the September 2019 parameters on page 10, and Remark 5.1 on page 11. ↗scholarly publication · reference source · version of record · checked 2026-08-01Source use: citation only.Describes the complete search through minimum coordinate 10^17 and the modular tests used for the 114 audit.Also cited at Booker and Sutherland, On a question of Mordell, PNAS 118(11), 2021, Sections 1 and 5.Also cited at Booker and Sutherland, Section 5.B and Remark 5.1, page 11.Also cited at Booker and Sutherland, Section 3, Lemma 3.2; exact residue replay in tc114-artifact-exact-verifier.Source named by the research packet.For A bounded three-cubes search for 114: The 2020 Charity Engine run searched the stated (d,z) rectangle for 114 and reported no solution.

CC0 bounded Diophantine search record grounded in a primary account of the modern three-cubes computation.

Discussion

Loading discussion.

Add a comment

Report comment

Flag this problem

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.