TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2578] VT zero-syndrome weight log-concavity through length 2000

Qualification pending

This question is undergoing qualification review.

Not Lean-verified
View the submitted solution
Contents

Problem. For \(7\le n\le2000\), let \(W_{n,k}\) count the words of weight \(k\) in \(V_n=\{x\in\{0,1\}^n:\sum_{i=1}^n i x_i\equiv0\pmod{n+1}\}\). Is \(W_{n,2},W_{n,3},\ldots,W_{n,n-2}\) log-concave for every such \(n\)?

Agent accessWork in ChatGPT

The agent reads this problem's research brief and asks you before it saves anything to TheoremDB.

Definitions and notation

1Definitions

Definition 1. A nonnegative sequence a_k is log-concave when a_k^2 >= a_{k-1}a_{k+1} at each internal index.

Definition 2. V_n is the zero-syndrome Varshamov-Tenengolts single-deletion code.

2What counts as a solution

  • Give an exact sweep through n=2000 with coefficient checksums and the first violating triple if one exists.

1Status

Saved packet · July 24, 2026

What counts as a solution

Saved solution (The truncated VT zero-syndrome weight sequence is log-concave through length 2000). Exact integer evaluation of the published coefficient formula verifies all 1,991,009 required inequalities.[1]

Verification

Let \[ V_n=\left\{x\in\{0,1\}^n:\sum_{i=1}^n i x_i\equiv0\pmod{n+1}\right\} \] and let \(W_{n,k}\) count its words of Hamming weight \(k\). For every \(7\leq n\leq2000\), the finite sequence \[ W_{n,2},W_{n,3},\ldots,W_{n,n-2} \] is log-concave. Equivalently, \[ W_{n,k}^2\geq W_{n,k-1}W_{n,k+1} \] for every \(3\leq k\leq n-3\).

The exhaustive sweep checks 1,991,009 inequalities with exact integers. Equality occurs only at \((n,k)=(10,3)\) and \((10,7)\). The corresponding triples are \((5,10,20)\) and \((20,10,5)\). The smallest positive margin is 1 at \((n,k)=(7,3)\), where the triple is \((3,4,5)\).

The lower endpoint is sharp for this finite statement. At \(n=6\), the internal triple is \((W_{6,2},W_{6,3},W_{6,4})=(3,2,3)\), whose log-concavity margin is \(-5\).

1Packet records

4 records

Notes and companion material

The target is a finite coefficient sweep. Length 6 has internal sequence 3,2,3, while every length 7 through 80 passed.

Original intake status. Status unknown. Weight enumerators of VT codes have explicit character formulas, so this inequality may be derivable or known.

  • The full weight sequence has forced zeros at weights 1 and n-1, so the internal truncation is essential.
  • Root-of-unity formulas introduce cancellation. A direct injection proving each quadratic inequality may preserve more positivity than Fourier expansion.

Recorded example 1. For n=10 the internal sequence is 5,10,20,22,20,10,5.

Computational notes

  • An exact dynamic program indexed by residue modulo n+1 and weight checked every 7 <= n <= 80. No log-concavity violation occurred. The same code reproduced the exceptional n=6 sequence 3,2,3.
How the 4 records connect
The overview places each record once. The relation list includes shared dependencies and names both ends of each link.

ProblemVT zero-syndrome weight log-concavity through length 2000

All 4 recorded relations between these records and the problem

2See also

Contribute to this problem
Cite this problem statement

Cite the original sources separately.

Plain text
“VT zero-syndrome weight log-concavity through length 2000.” TheoremDB. P2578. Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 6a691f052ccfa26ba7f9862ce99ad5fa1f4a3a5d0a35c4dac3451eca27a07acf. https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2578
BibTeX
@misc{theoremdb-problem-6a691f052ccfa26ba7f9862ce99ad5fa1f4a3a5d0a35c4dac3451eca27a07acf,
  title = {{VT zero-syndrome weight log-concavity through length 2000}},
  howpublished = {TheoremDB},
  note = {Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 6a691f052ccfa26ba7f9862ce99ad5fa1f4a3a5d0a35c4dac3451eca27a07acf},
  url = {https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2578}
}

This problem includes 4 records joined by 4 typed links, sourced from doi.org[1], current as of July 24, 2026.

1Lean verification

Lean formalization needed

A solution has been submitted and awaits independent review.

Open TheoremDB Researcher

Upload a Lean project archive

Once Lean accepts the draft, you can submit it while target review is pending. Your submission request is saved and continues after approval. Private checks stay private until you choose to submit.

1References

  1. Packet source. Reference record for “vt-zero-weight-log-concavity,” doi.org, checked 2026-08-01. Packet-wide source named in the dataset provenance. ↗journal article · reference source · checked 2026-08-01Source use: citation only.Supplies the source context used to assemble the packet for “vt zero weight log concavity.”Also cited at Exact formula evaluation and certificate in vt0-artifact-exact-coefficient-sweep.Also cited at Khodakhast Bibak and Olgica Milenkovic, Explicit Formulas for the Weight Enumerators of Some Classes of Deletion Correcting Codes, IEEE Transactions on Communications 67(3) (2019), 1809-1816, Theorems IV.7 and IV.8; Khodakhast Bibak, Bruce M. Kapron, and Venkatesh Srinivasan, Unweighted Linear Congruences with Distinct Coordinates and the Varshamov-Tenengolts Codes, Designs, Codes and Cryptography 86 (2018), 1893-1904, Corollary 3.12, DOI 10.1007/s10623-017-0428-3.Source named by the research packet.
  2. Reference record for “Replayable exact coefficient sweep through length 2000,” arxiv.org, checked 2026-08-01. Inline Python 3 exact computation executed on 2026-07-24. ↗preprint · reference source · arXiv:1812.09627, checked 2026-08-01 · checked 2026-08-01Source use: citation only.Documents the claim, method, computation, or status recorded as “Replayable exact coefficient sweep through length 2000” in this packet.
  3. Reference record for “Primary sources supply the coefficient formula,” doi.org, checked 2026-08-01. Khodakhast Bibak, Bruce M. Kapron, and Venkatesh Srinivasan, Unweighted Linear Congruences with Distinct Coordinates and the Varshamov-Tenengolts Codes, Designs, Codes and Cryptography 86 (2018), 1893-1904; Khodakhast Bibak and Olgica Milenkovic, Explicit Formulas for the Weight Enumerators of Some Classes of Deletion Correcting Codes, IEEE Transactions on Communications 67(3) (2019), 1809-1816. ↗journal article · reference source · checked 2026-08-01Source use: citation only.Documents the claim, method, computation, or status recorded as “Primary sources supply the coefficient formula” in this packet.

Original coefficient inequality candidate for a classical code family.

Discussion

Loading discussion.

Add a comment

Report comment

Flag this problem

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.