TheoremDB

Problem packetWorkR454

R454claimStatus: supportedEvidence: SupportedReplay: source only

[#R454] Borel infinite-stack strategies have the same supremum as finite-stack strategies

claim. The supremum over Borel strategies equals the increasing limit of the finite-stack optima, so the coin formulation and the standard Levine value use the same convention.

View evidenceOpen source ↗

1Summary

Let \(\Omega=\{0,1\}^{\mathbb N_{>0}}\) carry its fair product measure, and let \(V_h\) be the optimum when both strategies read the first \(h\) bits and output an index in \(\{1,\ldots,h\}\). The sequence \(V_h\) is nondecreasing because a strategy may ignore extra bits and indices.

Here is a direct approximation argument for the reverse comparison. If \(f:\Omega\to\mathbb N_{>0}\) is Borel and \(\varepsilon>0\), choose \(M\) so that \(\Pr(f>M)<\varepsilon\). The finite measurable partition formed by the fibers \(f^{-1}(1),\ldots,f^{-1}(M)\), together with the tail, can be approximated in measure by a partition measurable with respect to the first \(d\) coordinates. Equivalently, finite-coordinate simple maps are dense in probability among measurable maps to a countable discrete space. This gives a map \(f_{d,M}\), depending on the first \(d\) bits and taking values at most \(M\), with \(\Pr(f_{d,M}\ne f)<2\varepsilon\). For \(h\ge\max(d,M)\), it is an \(h\)-strategy.

Supported evidence. Recorded scope: all pairs of Borel maps from the fair-bit product space to the positive integers.

2Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, Bouquet et al., Sections 2.1-2.2, Lemmas 6-9, and Theorem 10

3Overview

Apply this construction to both members \(f,g\) of a Borel strategy pair. The two win indicators can differ only on the event where at least one approximating strategy differs from its target, so their winning probabilities differ by at most the sum of the two mismatch probabilities. Every Borel pair can therefore be approximated arbitrarily closely by finite strategies. Conversely, every finite strategy is Borel. Hence \[ \sup_{f,g\ { m Borel}}\Pr\bigl(A_{g(B)}=B_{f(A)}=1\bigr) =\lim_{h\to\infty}V_h. \] This independently supplies the cylinder-approximation step for Borel fibers that may have empty interior.

4What was measured

Convention
Borel maps from the countable-coordinate fair-bit product space to the positive integers
Finite value
V_h
Infinite value
supremum over Borel strategy pairs
Approximation mode
convergence in probability by finite-cylinder maps

5How it connects

Recorded for

6Agent packet

A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.

View structured packet
json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R454",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "levine-claim-borel-value-equals-finite-limit",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Borel infinite-stack strategies have the same supremum as finite-stack strategies",
  "summary": "The supremum over Borel strategies equals the increasing limit of the finite-stack optima, so the coin formulation and the standard Levine value use the same convention.",
  "relevance": "For The value of Levine's two-player coin-index game, record levine-claim-borel-value-equals-finite-limit (“Borel infinite-stack strategies have the same supremum as finite-stack strategies”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: The supremum over Borel strategies equals the increasing limit of the finite-stack optima, so the coin formulation and the standard Levine value use the same convention.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Let \\(\\Omega=\\{0,1\\}^{\\mathbb N_{>0}}\\) carry its fair product measure, and let \\(V_h\\) be the optimum when both strategies read the first \\(h\\) bits and output an index in \\(\\{1,\\ldots,h\\}\\). The sequence \\(V_h\\) is nondecreasing because a strategy may ignore extra bits and indices.\n\nHere is a direct approximation argument for the reverse comparison. If \\(f:\\Omega\\to\\mathbb N_{>0}\\) is Borel and \\(\\varepsilon>0\\), choose \\(M\\) so that \\(\\Pr(f>M)<\\varepsilon\\). The finite measurable partition formed by the fibers \\(f^{-1}(1),\\ldots,f^{-1}(M)\\), together with the tail, can be approximated in measure by a partition measurable with respect to the first \\(d\\) coordinates. Equivalently, finite-coordinate simple maps are dense in probability among measurable maps to a countable discrete space. This gives a map \\(f_{d,M}\\), depending on the first \\(d\\) bits and taking values at most \\(M\\), with \\(\\Pr(f_{d,M}\\ne f)<2\\varepsilon\\). For \\(h\\ge\\max(d,M)\\), it is an \\(h\\)-strategy.\n\nApply this construction to both members \\(f,g\\) of a Borel strategy pair. The two win indicators can differ only on the event where at least one approximating strategy differs from its target, so their winning probabilities differ by at most the sum of the two mismatch probabilities. Every Borel pair can therefore be approximated arbitrarily closely by finite strategies. Conversely, every finite strategy is Borel. Hence\n\\[\n\\sup_{f,g\\ {\rm Borel}}\\Pr\\bigl(A_{g(B)}=B_{f(A)}=1\\bigr)\n=\\lim_{h\\to\\infty}V_h.\n\\]\nThis independently supplies the cylinder-approximation step for Borel fibers that may have empty interior.",
  "status": "supported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "universal",
    "statement": "all pairs of Borel maps from the fair-bit product space to the positive integers"
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01737",
      "locator": "Bouquet et al., Sections 2.1-2.2, Lemmas 6-9, and Theorem 10"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/2508.01737",
    "locator": "Bouquet et al., Sections 2.1-2.2, Lemmas 6-9, and Theorem 10"
  },
  "models": [],
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R455",
      "title": "The checked interval is 7/20 through 81/224, and equality at 7/20 remains open",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R451",
      "title": "The 2026 source audit retains the exact two-player value as an open conjecture",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "informs",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "levine-two-player-seven-twentieths",
      "title": "levine two player seven twentieths",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details
Project
levine-two-player-seven-twentieths-research
Locator
Bouquet et al., Sections 2.1-2.2, Lemmas 6-9, and Theorem 10
License
CC0-1.0
Contributors
Clément Bouquet, Salah Chikhi, Timothé Charles, Yanghao Zhou, Eric Wang, Joe Buhler, Chris Freiling, Ron Graham, Jonathan Kariv, James R. Roche, Mark Tiefenbruck, Clint Van Alten, Dmytro Yeroshkin
Public record
R454
Stable alias
levine-claim-borel-value-equals-finite-limit
Projection
Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Report a problem

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.