TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR942

R942Sourced evidence

Current status and unresolved remainder

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-31. The published paper reports this distribution as a counterexample with overwhelming simulation confidence. Its Claim 2.3 depends on a finite probability inequality verified numerically, and the authors explain that an analytic finite calculation could convert it into a theorem. Give a rigorous bound establishing the finite probability inequality required by the published coalescence criterion for the stated distribution, then derive almost-sure blue victory for every complete legal order.

The record cites sources for its explanation.

Recorded status: reported

Recorded scope: No scope is recorded.

Originating problem: A rigorous stochastic-dominance counterexample in one-dimensional coalescence

Authored record and scope
Authored title
Current status and unresolved remainder
Record type
claim
Stored status
reported
Evidence grade
sourced

2Authored explanation

UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-31. The published paper reports this distribution as a counterexample with overwhelming simulation confidence. Its Claim 2.3 depends on a finite probability inequality verified numerically, and the authors explain that an analytic finite calculation could convert it into a theorem.

A complete resolution must satisfy this condition: Give a rigorous bound establishing the finite probability inequality required by the published coalescence criterion for the stated distribution, then derive almost-sure blue victory for every complete legal order.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: mathoverflow.net ↗, See dataset.references[0] for the exact external source and locator.

4How it connects

Addressed by

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R942",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "coalescence-stochastic-dominance-counterexample-claim-status-20260731",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "Current status and unresolved remainder",
  "summary": "UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-31. The published paper reports this distribution as a counterexample with overwhelming simulation confidence. Its Claim 2.3 depends on a finite probability inequality verified numerically, and the authors explain that an analytic finite calculation could convert it into a theorem. Give a rigorous bound establishing the finite probability inequality required by the published coalescence criterion for the stated distribution, then derive almost-sure blue victory for every complete legal order.",
  "relevance": "For coalescence stochastic dominance counterexample, pins the dated research frontier: UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-31. The published paper reports this distribution as a counterexample with overwhelming simulation confidence. Its Claim 2.3 depends on a finite probability inequality verified numerically, and the authors explain that an analytic finite calculation could convert it into a.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-31. The published paper reports this distribution as a counterexample with overwhelming simulation confidence. Its Claim 2.3 depends on a finite probability inequality verified numerically, and the authors explain that an analytic finite calculation could convert it into a theorem.\n\nA complete resolution must satisfy this condition: Give a rigorous bound establishing the finite probability inequality required by the published coalescence criterion for the stated distribution, then derive almost-sure blue victory for every complete legal order.",
  "status": "reported",
  "evidence_grade": "sourced",
  "scope": null,
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/56048/alternating-colors-on-a-line-infinitely-often-or-converge",
      "locator": "See dataset.references[0] for the exact external source and locator."
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://mathoverflow.net/questions/56048/alternating-colors-on-a-line-infinitely-often-or-converge",
    "locator": "See dataset.references[0] for the exact external source and locator."
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R941",
      "title": "Resolve the stated acceptance condition",
      "object_type": "attempt",
      "relation": "addresses",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "coalescence-stochastic-dominance-counterexample",
      "title": "coalescence stochastic dominance counterexample",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

6Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.