Problem packetWorkR456
[#R456] The truncated strategy is a best response to itself through seven blocks
claim. For every truncation with \(1\le m\le7\), exact enumeration finds no unilateral deterministic improvement over the symmetric three-block strategy.
1Summary
Fix one player's \((3m+1)\)-hat truncation of the three-block strategy. For every observed string of the other player, a deterministic best response can choose the coordinate with the greatest exact winning count. The computation exhausts all observed strings, evaluates every coordinate, and sums these pointwise maxima.
For each \(m=1,\ldots,7\), the best-response total equals the total achieved by using the same truncated strategy on both sides. The best-response excess is exactly zero. The checked probabilities run from \(11/32\) for \(m=1\) to \(187904819/536870912\) for \(m=7\). Direct enumeration of all pairs of bit strings supplies a second implementation for \(m\le3\).
Reproduced evidence. Recorded scope: the finite first-nonmonochromatic three-block strategy with its fallback coordinate, for 1 through 7 blocks.
2Evidence
A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.
Verification source: Exact run of tools/levine_three_block_best_response.py --max-blocks 7 on 2026-07-28
3Overview
This is a bounded unilateral-optimality result for one fixed opponent strategy. It gives no global upper bound on \(V_{3m+1}\), and it does not prove that the infinite recursive strategy is optimal.
4What was measured
- Blocks checked
- 1-7
- Hats checked
- 4, 7, 10, 13, 16, 19, 22
- Best response excess
- 0 for every checked instance
- Direct pair cross check blocks
- 1-3
5How it connects
Evidenced by
- artifact
Informs
- claim
Supports
- claim
Recorded for
- problem
6Agent packet
A compact handoff with the evidence boundary, replay manifest, and relation pointers.
View structured packet
{
"schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
"ref": "R456",
"content_hash": null,
"slug": "levine-claim-self-best-response-through-seven-blocks",
"type": "claim",
"title": "The truncated strategy is a best response to itself through seven blocks",
"summary": "For every truncation with \\(1\\le m\\le7\\), exact enumeration finds no unilateral deterministic improvement over the symmetric three-block strategy.",
"relevance": "For The value of Levine's two-player coin-index game, record levine-claim-self-best-response-through-seven-blocks (“The truncated strategy is a best response to itself through seven blocks”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: For every truncation with \\(1\\le m\\le7\\), exact enumeration finds no unilateral deterministic improvement over the symmetric three-block strategy.",
"relevance_source": "recorded",
"body": "Fix one player's \\((3m+1)\\)-hat truncation of the three-block strategy. For every observed string of the other player, a deterministic best response can choose the coordinate with the greatest exact winning count. The computation exhausts all observed strings, evaluates every coordinate, and sums these pointwise maxima.\n\nFor each \\(m=1,\\ldots,7\\), the best-response total equals the total achieved by using the same truncated strategy on both sides. The best-response excess is exactly zero. The checked probabilities run from \\(11/32\\) for \\(m=1\\) to \\(187904819/536870912\\) for \\(m=7\\). Direct enumeration of all pairs of bit strings supplies a second implementation for \\(m\\le3\\).\n\nThis is a bounded unilateral-optimality result for one fixed opponent strategy. It gives no global upper bound on \\(V_{3m+1}\\), and it does not prove that the infinite recursive strategy is optimal.",
"status": "observed",
"evidence_grade": "computational",
"scope": {
"kind": "bounded",
"statement": "the finite first-nonmonochromatic three-block strategy with its fallback coordinate, for 1 through 7 blocks",
"bounds": {
"blocks": {
"min": 1,
"max": 7
},
"finite_hat_count": {
"min": 4,
"max": 22
},
"observed_strings_per_instance": {
"min": 16,
"max": 4194304
},
"observed_strings_total": {
"min": 4793488,
"max": 4793488
}
},
"exhaustive": true
},
"reproduction": {
"schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
"readiness": "source_only",
"kind": "claim",
"citation": {
"locator": "Exact run of tools/levine_three_block_best_response.py --max-blocks 7 on 2026-07-28"
},
"missing": [
"source",
"command",
"runtime",
"expected_output"
]
},
"formal_statement": null,
"source": {
"url": null,
"locator": "Exact run of tools/levine_three_block_best_response.py --max-blocks 7 on 2026-07-28"
},
"models": [],
"relations": [
{
"slug": "R449",
"title": "Exact finite best-response enumerator",
"object_type": "artifact",
"relation": "evidences",
"direction": "incoming"
},
{
"slug": "R455",
"title": "The checked interval is 7/20 through 81/224, and equality at 7/20 remains open",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "informs",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "R457",
"title": "The three-block strategy is a best response to itself at every depth",
"object_type": "claim",
"relation": "supports",
"direction": "outgoing"
},
{
"slug": "levine-two-player-seven-twentieths",
"title": "levine two player seven twentieths",
"object_type": "problem",
"relation": "recorded_for",
"direction": "outgoing"
}
]
}7Provenance
View source, identifiers, and projection details
- Project
- levine-two-player-seven-twentieths-research
- Locator
- Exact run of tools/levine_three_block_best_response.py --max-blocks 7 on 2026-07-28
- License
- CC0-1.0
- Public record
- R456
- Stable alias
- levine-claim-self-best-response-through-seven-blocks
- Projection
- Reproduction fields are derived from the immutable record.
A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.