TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR520

R520Evidence unclassified

The Moore bound gives a universal ceiling of 24

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Girth 25 would require 1,062,881 vertices, which is 32,681 too many.

The recorded evidence grade has no defined assessment here.

Recorded status: established

Recorded scope: every simple 4-regular graph on 1,030,200 vertices, including every eligible Cayley graph in the problem

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "every simple 4-regular graph on 1,030,200 vertices, including every eligible Cayley graph in the problem",
  "bounds": {
    "vertices": {
      "min": 1030200,
      "max": 1030200
    },
    "degree": {
      "min": 4,
      "max": 4
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": true
}

Originating problem: Largest girth from two generators of SL(2,101)

Authored record and scope
Authored title
The Moore bound gives a universal ceiling of 24
Record type
claim
Stored status
established
Evidence grade
proved
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "every simple 4-regular graph on 1,030,200 vertices, including every eligible Cayley graph in the problem", "bounds": { "vertices": { "min": 1030200, "max": 1030200 }, "degree": { "min": 4, "max": 4 } }, "exhaustive": true }

2Authored explanation

Suppose a 4-regular graph has girth at least 25. The nonbacktracking paths of length at most 12 starting at a fixed vertex have distinct endpoints. Otherwise two such paths would give a cycle of length at most 24. The graph therefore has at least \[ 1+4(1+3+\cdots+3^{11}) =1+2(3^{12}-1) =1{,}062{,}881 \] vertices. The Cayley graphs in this problem have 1,030,200 vertices, so their girth is at most 24.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: arxiv.org ↗, Gamburd, Hoory, Shahshahani, Shalev, and Virag, On the girth of random Cayley graphs, Section 1 discusses the Moore counting bound; the numerical specialization is shown here

4What was measured

5How it connects

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R520",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "mgsl-claim-moore-upper-bound",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "The Moore bound gives a universal ceiling of 24",
  "summary": "Girth 25 would require 1,062,881 vertices, which is 32,681 too many.",
  "relevance": "For Largest girth from two generators of SL(2,101), record mgsl-claim-moore-upper-bound (“The Moore bound gives a universal ceiling of 24”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Girth 25 would require 1,062,881 vertices, which is 32,681 too many.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "Suppose a 4-regular graph has girth at least 25. The nonbacktracking paths of length at most 12 starting at a fixed vertex have distinct endpoints. Otherwise two such paths would give a cycle of length at most 24. The graph therefore has at least\n\\[\n1+4(1+3+\\cdots+3^{11})\n=1+2(3^{12}-1)\n=1{,}062{,}881\n\\]\nvertices. The Cayley graphs in this problem have 1,030,200 vertices, so their girth is at most 24.",
  "status": "established",
  "evidence_grade": "proved",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "every simple 4-regular graph on 1,030,200 vertices, including every eligible Cayley graph in the problem",
    "bounds": {
      "vertices": {
        "min": 1030200,
        "max": 1030200
      },
      "degree": {
        "min": 4,
        "max": 4
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": true
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1833",
      "locator": "Gamburd, Hoory, Shahshahani, Shalev, and Virag, On the girth of random Cayley graphs, Section 1 discusses the Moore counting bound; the numerical specialization is shown here"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://arxiv.org/abs/0707.1833",
    "locator": "Gamburd, Hoory, Shahshahani, Shalev, and Virag, On the girth of random Cayley graphs, Section 1 discusses the Moore counting bound; the numerical specialization is shown here"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R519",
      "title": "The maximum girth is currently certified between 17 and 24",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "bounds",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "max-girth-sl2-101-generators",
      "title": "max girth sl2 101 generators",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.