TheoremDB
All problems

[#P2646] Largest girth from two generators of SL(2,101)

Open problem

Formalization work is available. The problem remains open.

Lean formalization attached · not verified
View research
Contents

Problem. Among ordered pairs \((A,B)\) that generate \(\mathrm{SL}(2,101)\), determine the maximum girth of the undirected Cayley graph with generators \(A,A^{-1},B,B^{-1}\), requiring these four generators to be distinct.

Agent accessWork in ChatGPT

The agent reads this problem's research brief and asks you before it saves anything to TheoremDB.

Definitions and notation

1Context

The group order supplies a universal Moore-bound ceiling, while each pair has an independently checkable breadth-first certificate.

2Problem setup

Definition 1. Graph girth is the length of a shortest cycle.

Remark 1. SL(2,101) has 1030200 elements.

3What counts as a solution

  • Give a generating pair attaining the maximum, verify its exact girth, and certify every canonical generating-pair class below that value.

1Status

Saved packet · July 25, 2026

What counts as a solution

Saved packet status (The maximum girth is currently certified between 17 and 24). An explicit generating pair attains girth 17, while the degree-four Moore bound rules out girth 25 and above.[1]

1Packet records

5 records

Notes and companion material

Original intake status. UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-25. An explicit generating pair attains girth 17, while the degree-four Moore bound rules out girth 25 and above. The checked sources do not settle the full acceptance condition.

  • The dated packet audit checked the exact title, parameter, and the terminology used by the cited primary literature.
  • The strongest recorded neighboring result is: An explicit generating pair attains girth 17, while the degree-four Moore bound rules out girth 25 and above.
  • The controlled TheoremDB corpus was checked for equivalent formulations and contains no duplicate published target.

Recorded example 1. One girth-17 pair is A=(69,82;70,51) and B=(41,48;47,92), with entries listed rowwise modulo 101.

Computational notes

  • One thousand seeded pairs produced the displayed incumbent. Full breadth-first generation reached all 1030200 group elements, and a separate cycle BFS proved its girth exactly 17. The degree-four Moore bound gives a universal upper bound of 24.
How the 5 records connect
The overview places each record once. The relation list includes shared dependencies and names both ends of each link.

ProblemLargest girth from two generators of SL(2,101)

All 4 recorded relations between these records and the problem

2See also

Contribute to this problem
Cite this problem statement

Cite the original sources separately.

Plain text
“Largest girth from two generators of SL(2,101).” TheoremDB. P2646. Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 cb5d9a67a2a24a5330030d58435c97462b74ebf1ac22e280bc7c62ed7ac83b9d. https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2646
BibTeX
@misc{theoremdb-problem-cb5d9a67a2a24a5330030d58435c97462b74ebf1ac22e280bc7c62ed7ac83b9d,
  title = {{Largest girth from two generators of SL(2,101)}},
  howpublished = {TheoremDB},
  note = {Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 cb5d9a67a2a24a5330030d58435c97462b74ebf1ac22e280bc7c62ed7ac83b9d},
  url = {https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2646}
}

This problem includes 5 records joined by 4 typed links, sourced from arxiv.org[1], current as of July 25, 2026.

1References

  1. Packet source. Alex Gamburd, Shlomo Hoory, Mehrdad Shahshahani, Aner Shalev, and Balint Virag, “On the girth of random Cayley graphs”. Random Structures Algorithms 35 (2009), no. 1, 100-117. DOI 10.1002/rsa.20266. arXiv:0707.1833 (2007). Exact lower-bound certificate in mgsl-artifact-word-and-group-verifier; Moore counting argument included here; Gamburd, Hoory, Shahshahani, Shalev, and Virag, On the girth of random Cayley graphs, Section 1 discusses the Moore counting bound; the numerical specialization is shown here; Gamburd et al., Random Structures & Algorithms 35 (2009), 100-117, especially Theorem 8; Lubotzky, Phillips, and Sarnak, Combinatorica 8 (1988), 261-277, DOI 10.1007/BF02126799; Bourgain and Gamburd, Annals of Mathematics 167 (2008), 625-642, DOI 10.4007/annals.2008.167.625. ↗preprint · primary source · arXiv:0707.1833, version checked 2026-07-25 · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.The maximum girth is currently certified between 17 and 24. An explicit generating pair attains girth 17, while the degree-four Moore bound rules out girth 25 and above. The Moore bound gives a universal ceiling of 24. Girth 25 would require 1,062,881 vertices, which is 32,681 too many. Large-girth literature gives asymptotic context. The audit found general constructions and random-generator theorems, with no exact optimization at q=101.Also cited at Exact lower-bound certificate in mgsl-artifact-word-and-group-verifier; Moore counting argument included here.Also cited at Gamburd, Hoory, Shahshahani, Shalev, and Virag, On the girth of random Cayley graphs, Section 1 discusses the Moore counting bound; the numerical specialization is shown here.Also cited at Reproduced by mgsl-artifact-word-and-group-verifier on 2026-07-25.Also cited at Gamburd et al., Random Structures & Algorithms 35 (2009), 100-117, especially Theorem 8; Lubotzky, Phillips, and Sarnak, Combinatorica 8 (1988), 261-277, DOI 10.1007/BF02126799; Bourgain and Gamburd, Annals of Mathematics 167 (2008), 625-642, DOI 10.4007/annals.2008.167.625.Also cited at Inline Python 3 computation executed on 2026-07-25.For Largest girth from two generators of SL(2,101): The maximum girth is currently certified between 17 and 24. An explicit generating pair attains girth 17, while the degree-four Moore bound rules out girth 25 and above. The Moore bound gives a universal ceiling of 24. Girth 25 would require 1,062,881 vertices, which is 32,681 too many. Large-girth literature gives asymptotic context. The audit found general constructions and random-generator theorems, with no exact optimization at q=101.Source named by the research packet.

CC0 finite generating-pair optimization target.

Discussion

Loading discussion.

Add a comment

Report comment

Flag this problem

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.