TheoremDB

Problem packetResearch packetR655

R655Reproduced evidence

A rigorous elementary bracket contains the estimate

View evidenceOpen source ↗
Link to a section

Authored summary

Published lower and divisibility theorems plus a direct row-choice bound give 4410573106297854867267286926659737440 <= R_12 <= (11!)^11.

The recorded result has been reproduced within its stated scope.

Recorded status: established

Recorded scope: all reduced Latin squares of order 12

Complete recorded scope and conditions
{
  "kind": "bounded",
  "statement": "all reduced Latin squares of order 12",
  "bounds": {
    "order": {
      "min": 12,
      "max": 12
    }
  },
  "exhaustive": true
}

Originating problem: Number of reduced Latin squares of order 12

Authored record and scope
Authored title
A rigorous elementary bracket contains the estimate
Record type
claim
Stored status
established
Evidence grade
reproduced
Recorded scope data
{ "kind": "bounded", "statement": "all reduced Latin squares of order 12", "bounds": { "order": { "min": 12, "max": 12 } }, "exhaustive": true }

2Authored explanation

The standard van der Waerden permanent bound quoted by McKay and Wanless gives \[ L_n\ge\frac{(n!)^{2n}}{n^{n^2}}. \] After dividing by \(12!11!\), the order-12 reduced count is at least the ceiling of the resulting rational number: \[ R_{12}\ge4410573106297854867267286926659737034. \] Their Theorem 2 also proves that \(R_{2m}\) is divisible by \(m!\). Thus \(R_{12}\) is divisible by \(6!=720\), and rounding the preceding lower bound to the next multiple gives \[ R_{12}\ge4410573106297854867267286926659737440. \] For an elementary upper bound, fix the first row and column. Each of the remaining 11 rows has at most \(11!\) possible fillings once its first entry is fixed. Ignoring the column restrictions can only increase the count, so \[ R_{12}\le(11!)^{11}=409933016554924328182440935903164918932547530146724293451448320000000000000000000000. \] The published estimate \(1.62\times10^{44}\) lies inside this broad rigorous interval.

Continue this work
Replay material: source only

3Evidence

Replay package: source only

A verification source is cited. This record has no executable replay attached.

Verification source: doi.org ↗, McKay and Wanless, On the Number of Latin Squares, Theorem 2 and the standard lower bound quoted in Section 7; arithmetic replayed in rls12-artifact-small-order-replay

4What was measured

5How it connects

Recorded for

Machine-readable record

Copy the structured record when continuing this work with an agent.

json
{
  "schema": "theoremdb-agent-record-v1",
  "ref": "R655",
  "content_hash": null,
  "slug": "rls12-claim-rigorous-bracket",
  "type": "claim",
  "title": "A rigorous elementary bracket contains the estimate",
  "summary": "Published lower and divisibility theorems plus a direct row-choice bound give 4410573106297854867267286926659737440 <= R_12 <= (11!)^11.",
  "relevance": "For Number of reduced Latin squares of order 12, record rls12-claim-rigorous-bracket (“A rigorous elementary bracket contains the estimate”) records a bound, answer, status fact, or structural consequence. The record states: Published lower and divisibility theorems plus a direct row-choice bound give 4410573106297854867267286926659737440 <= R_12 <= (11!)^11.",
  "relevance_source": "recorded",
  "body": "The standard van der Waerden permanent bound quoted by McKay and Wanless gives\n\\[\nL_n\\ge\\frac{(n!)^{2n}}{n^{n^2}}.\n\\]\nAfter dividing by \\(12!11!\\), the order-12 reduced count is at least the ceiling of the resulting rational number:\n\\[\nR_{12}\\ge4410573106297854867267286926659737034.\n\\]\nTheir Theorem 2 also proves that \\(R_{2m}\\) is divisible by \\(m!\\). Thus \\(R_{12}\\) is divisible by \\(6!=720\\), and rounding the preceding lower bound to the next multiple gives\n\\[\nR_{12}\\ge4410573106297854867267286926659737440.\n\\]\nFor an elementary upper bound, fix the first row and column. Each of the remaining 11 rows has at most \\(11!\\) possible fillings once its first entry is fixed. Ignoring the column restrictions can only increase the count, so\n\\[\nR_{12}\\le(11!)^{11}=409933016554924328182440935903164918932547530146724293451448320000000000000000000000.\n\\]\nThe published estimate \\(1.62\\times10^{44}\\) lies inside this broad rigorous interval.",
  "status": "established",
  "evidence_grade": "reproduced",
  "scope": {
    "kind": "bounded",
    "statement": "all reduced Latin squares of order 12",
    "bounds": {
      "order": {
        "min": 12,
        "max": 12
      }
    },
    "exhaustive": true
  },
  "reproduction": {
    "schema": "theoremdb-reproduction-v1",
    "readiness": "source_only",
    "kind": "claim",
    "citation": {
      "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-005-0261-7",
      "locator": "McKay and Wanless, On the Number of Latin Squares, Theorem 2 and the standard lower bound quoted in Section 7; arithmetic replayed in rls12-artifact-small-order-replay"
    },
    "missing": [
      "source",
      "command",
      "runtime",
      "expected_output"
    ]
  },
  "formal_statement": null,
  "source": {
    "url": "https://doi.org/10.1007/s00026-005-0261-7",
    "locator": "McKay and Wanless, On the Number of Latin Squares, Theorem 2 and the standard lower bound quoted in Section 7; arithmetic replayed in rls12-artifact-small-order-replay"
  },
  "models": [],
  "continuation": null,
  "relations": [
    {
      "slug": "R651",
      "title": "Exact small-order enumeration and order-12 arithmetic replay",
      "object_type": "artifact",
      "relation": "supports",
      "direction": "incoming"
    },
    {
      "slug": "R652",
      "title": "The exact enumeration record ends at order 11",
      "object_type": "claim",
      "relation": "bounds",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    },
    {
      "slug": "reduced-latin-squares-order-12",
      "title": "reduced latin squares order 12",
      "object_type": "problem",
      "relation": "recorded_for",
      "direction": "outgoing"
    }
  ]
}

7Provenance

View source, identifiers, and projection details

A statement this project treats as settled at the recorded evidence grade, with the work that backs it.

Sign in to follow

Sign in in another tab, then return here.

Open sign-in in another tab

Report a problem

Report location:

Your ChatGPT account

Opening ChatGPT

ChatGPT is opening in a new tab.