[#P2594] Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips
Contents
Problem. For \(1\le n\le10000\), let \(G_n=C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) and \(I_n(z)=\sum_k i_{n,k}z^k\) be its independence polynomial. Is the coefficient sequence \((i_{n,k})_k\) log-concave for every such \(n\)?
Agent access
Work on this problem in ChatGPTDefinitions and notation
1Context
This is a finite transfer-matrix sweep with reusable progress by terminal n. Exact work has reached n=40.
2Problem setup
Remark 1. i_{n,k} is the number of k-vertex independent sets in G_n.
Definition 1. C_4 square P_n denotes the Cartesian product C_4 with the n-vertex path.
3What counts as a solution
- Give an exact transfer sweep through n=10000 with checksums, or report the first n and coefficient index where log-concavity fails.
1Status
Current status (Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequence). Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked.[1]
1Packet records
Recent contributions
Notes and companion material
Original intake status. UNKNOWN as of 2026-07-25. Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked. The checked sources do not settle the full acceptance condition.
- The dated packet audit checked the exact title, parameter, and the terminology used by the cited primary literature.
- The strongest recorded neighboring result is: Exact transfer verifies log-concavity for every \(C_4\mathbin{\square}P_n\) with \(1\le n\le3000\); the cases \(3001\le n\le10000\) remain unchecked.
- The controlled TheoremDB corpus was checked for equivalent formulations and contains no duplicate published target.
Recorded example 1. I_2(z)=1+8z+16z^2+8z^3+2z^4, which is log-concave and has nonreal roots.
Computational notes
- Exact integer transfer matrices computed every I_n through n=40 and found no log-concavity violation. Numerical root calculation at n=2 found imaginary parts as large as approximately 1.71319, confirming that real-rootedness cannot prove this case.
How the 3 records connect
ProblemHard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips
- Computation 1Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequencein this packetReproduced
- Artifact 1Replayable exact transfer sweep through strip length 3000reproducesExecutable material
- Route 1The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettledinformsSupported
All 2 recorded relations between these records and the problem
- Replayable exact transfer sweep through strip length 3000 reproduces Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequence
- The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled informs Every four-cycle strip through length 3000 has a log-concave independence sequence
2See also
- Exact heat-bath spectral gap on the six by six Ising torusmathematical physics
- Most antiferromagnetic ground states in a 3-connected cubic graph on twenty verticesmathematical physics
- Nearest hard-square partition-function zero for the sixteen gridmathematical physics
Contribute to this problem
Cite this problem statement
Cite the original sources separately.
“Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips.” TheoremDB. P2594. Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab. https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2594
@misc{theoremdb-problem-648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab,
title = {{Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips}},
howpublished = {TheoremDB},
note = {Problem statement; statement text SHA-256 648bbda6e63f8873268325dfdc38e2161694e3ff96c5ae93dc033b2e141ebbab},
url = {https://theoremdb.org/statement/?ref=P2594}
}Plain text: Built Markdown snapshot
This problem includes 3 records joined by 2 typed links, sourced from doi.org[1], current as of July 25, 2026.
1References
- Packet source. Neil J. Calkin and Herbert S. Wilf, “The Number of Independent Sets in a Grid Graph”. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60. DOI 10.1137/S089548019528993X. Neil J. Calkin and Herbert S. Wilf, The Number of Independent Sets in a Grid Graph, SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60, Section 1; Maria Chudnovsky and Paul Seymour, The Roots of the Independence Polynomial of a Clawfree Graph, Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357, DOI 10.1016/j.jctb.2006.06.001. ↗journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.Also cited at SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics 11(1) (1998), 54-60, Section 1.Also cited at Exact transfer and replay certificate in hcc4-artifact-exact-transfer-sweep.Also cited at Inline Python 3 exact computation executed on 2026-07-25.For Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips: The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.Source named by the research packet.
- Maria Chudnovsky and Paul Seymour, “The roots of the independence polynomial of a clawfree graph”. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357. DOI 10.1016/j.jctb.2006.06.001. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series B 97(3) (2007), 350-357. ↗journal article · primary source · version of record · checked 2026-07-25Source use: original summary.The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.For Hard-core coefficient log-concavity on the first ten thousand four-cycle strips: The grid-transfer literature gives the method, while this coefficient question appears unsettled. The located primary sources support the transfer construction and the claw-free real-rootedness boundary; none reports this cylindrical width-four log-concavity sweep.
Original strip-family coefficient conjecture for the hard-core lattice gas.
Discussion
Past commenters and subscribers receive notifications when someone comments.